TYPES OF RURAL AND URBAN TERRITORIES IN POLAND, HUNGARY, ROMANIA AND EUROPEAN RUSSIA

Author:

Ershov A. M.1

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Four post-socialist countries of Eastern Europe (Poland, Hungary, Romania and Russia) were comparatively analyzed in terms of the relative position and dynamics of different types of territories over a ten-year period from 2010 to 2020. The author develops methodological ideas about the usage of individual typology to create a socio-economic profile of a territory in order to identify spatial inequality of the countries under study upon socio-demographic, economic and infrastructural indicators. The results of the analysis allowed concluding about dominant trends of socio-economic differentiation between rural, urban and periurban zones. It was found that the intraregional spatial convergence is not an obligatory consequence of the socio-economic development of a country. The transformation processes which accompany the post-socialist transition led to the formation of different models of spatial socio-economic differentiation in each country, i. e. relatively balanced development in Poland, zonal development in Hungary and differentiated development in Romania and European Russia. The author suggests a concept of main stages and directions of the socio-economic differentiation of territories, which helps to systematize statistically-obtained conclusions.

Funder

Russian Science Foundation

Publisher

Moscow University Press

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference22 articles.

1. Alekseev A.I., Zubarevich N.V. Krizis urbanizacii i sel’skaya mestnost’ Rossii [The crisis of urbanization and the rural area of Russia], Problemy prognozirovaniya, 2000, no. 4, p. 138–146. (In Russian)

2. Banski J. Spatial differences in the transformation processes taking place in rural areas of East-Central Europe // Three Decades of Transformation in the East-Central European Countryside, 2019, p. 3–19.

3. Churski P., Herodowicz T., Konecka-Szydlowska B., Perdal R. Differentiation of the Socio-Economic Development of Poland – “Invisible” Historical Heritage, Land, 2021, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 12–47.

4. Dachin A. Rural development-a basic condition for narrowing regional disparities in Romania, Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 2008, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 106–117.

5. Ianos I., Petrişor A.-I., Zamfir D., Cercleux A.-L., Stoica I.-V., Talanga C. In search of a relevant index measuring territorial disparities in a transition country. Romania as a case study, Die Erde – Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 2013, vol. 144, no. 1, p. 69–81.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3