Author:
Xi F., ,Bobyleva A.Z.,Lvova O.A., ,
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to develop methodological approaches to the formation of a multi-level system of public administration for sustainable development on the example of Russia and China. The proposed approaches include: general characteristics of the sustainable development management system (subject, object, forms, principles, methods, result), formalization of project selection, principles for identifying project relationships, tools for prioritizing projects, a model for monitoring program performance. Multilevel implies integration not only at the national, mezzo and micro levels, but also at the supranational level - the participation of the United Nations and other international organizations, the implementation of joint projects, primarily with friendly countries. Developed on the example of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No. 13 “Taking urgent measures to combat climate change and its consequences”, the network management model allows formalizing the choice of projects constituting the program, principles and approaches to identifying the interconnection of projects, tools for prioritizing projects, and can be extrapolated to other SDGs with high network ranks (the degree of mutual influence on other SDGs). To assess the quality of public administration for sustainable development, the following indicators are proposed: the complexity of national programs and the quality of goal setting, adaptability and flexibility of state institutions in implementing sustainable development goals; business involvement in the transition to sustainable development; efficiency and effectiveness of the management system; compliance of legislation and law enforcement with sustainable development objectives; the level of achievement of planned results by the managed system; the degree of publicity when assessment of sustainable projects. Such a set of indicators makes it possible to integrate the assessment of the managed and the management system, to highlight the role of the management system in the results achieved by the managed system.
Reference15 articles.
1. Аньшин В.М. Системный подход в управлении трансформационными программами в компании // Научные исследования и разработки. Российский журнал управления проектами. 2016. Т. 5. No 2. С. 3-20.
2. Аньшин В.М., Бобылева А.З. Управление процессами антикризисной цифровой трансформации на примере бройлерного производства // АПК: Экономика, управление. 2021. No 2. С. 33-40.
3. Барабашев А.Г., Макаров А.А., Макаров И.А. О совершенствовании индикативных оценок качества государственного управления // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2019. No 2. С. 7-38.
4. Львова О.А. Разработка сетевых трансформационных программ оздоровления проблемных компаний на примере машиностроительной отрасли // Научные исследования и разработки. Российский журнал управления проектами. 2023. Т. 12. No 2. С. 3-11.
5. Новиков Д.А. Методология управления. М.: Либроком, 2011.