A SOIL BIODIAGNOSTICS METHODOLOGY AND FEATURES OF SOME BIOINDICATION AND BIOTESTING METHODS (REVIEW)

Author:

TEREKHOVA V. A.1,KULACHKOVA S. A.1,MORACHEVSKAYA E.V.1,KIRYUSHINA A. P.2

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University

2. IPEE RAS named after A.N. Severtsov

Abstract

The methodology for biodiagnostics of the ecological state of soils and other environmental objects involves the use of two approaches: bioindicative observations in situand biotesting of samples, carried out according to standard methods in controlled laboratory conditions ex situ. An integrated assessment of soils on an interdisciplinary basis in accordance with the international standard ISO19204-2017 makes it possible to diagnose of soils “health” based on biotic parameters in the course of natural environmental observations, ecotoxicity indicators, which are supple-mented by the results of quantitative chemical analysis (TRIAD methodology). For soils, indicators of the state of higher plants and microbial communities, especially in agroecosystems, are of paramount importance. The article analyzes the advantages and limitations of well-known methods of phytoindication, laboratory phytotesting, soil respiration, structural and functional indicators of microbiota diversity and bacterial biosensors. The responses of living systems to the same pollutant content largely depend on the carbon content of organic matter. The existing regulatory framework for the ecological assessment of the biological state of soil ecosystems practically does not take into account this, as well as the level of mineralization and pH of the analyzed objects. For an adequate assessment of the ecological quality of soils, it is proposed to improve the methods of measuring toxicity by more targeted recommendations for application (for example, for certain gradations of humus content, mineralization, pH).

Funder

Russian Science Foundation

Publisher

Moscow University Press

Reference52 articles.

1. Ананьева Н.Д . Микробиологические аспекты самоочищения и устойчивости почв. М., 2003.

2. Вершинин А.А., Петров А.М., Юранец-Лужаева Р.Ч. и др. Коэффициент микробного дыхания различных типов почв в условиях нефтяного загрязнения // Вестн. технологического ун-та. 2017. Т. 20, № 4.

3. Воробейчик Е.Л., Садыков О.Ф., Фарафонтов М.Г. Экологическое нормирование техногенных загрязнений наземных экосистем (локальный уровень). Екатеринбург, 1994.

4. Глебов В.В., Киричук А.А. Возможности биомониторинга в оценке экологического состояния экосистем столичного мегаполиса // МНКО. 2014. № 5 (48).

5. Горленко М.В., Кожевин П.А . Мультисубстратное тестирование природных микробных сообществ. М., 2005.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3