Affiliation:
1. V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Institute
2. Lomonosov Moscow State University
3. V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Institute; Lomonosov Moscow State University
4. RUTH (MIIT)
Abstract
The article provides data on a comparative analysis of the features of vegetation restoration in areas of oligotrophic bogs with a high degree of oil product pollution, located on the territory of an oil field in the Middle Ob region, reclaimed according to standard schemes, widely used in the 2000s, and by cutting off oil-contaminated soil. The total projective vegetation cover (TPVC) of all reclaimed areas mostly reaches standard values (above 30%). The TPVC in areas without cutting is slightly higher than in areas with cutting due to the difference in recovery time in favor of the former. At the same time, the average number of all recorded species in areas with cutting is slightly higher, and they include some oligotrophic vascular plants (heather shrubs, Drosera rotundifolia, Eriophorum vaginatum), which spread much less frequently in areas without cutting. The projective cover of the herb-shrub layer is higher in areas without cutting. The content of oil products in the surface layer of 0-20 cm in areas with cutting is generally lower compared to areas reclaimed by traditional methods. However, even high concentrations (more than 250 g∙kg-1) do not have a significant negative effect on the total projective cover of the grass/herb-shrub layer, while its minimum values are primarily associated with a lack of moisture on high microrelief elements. Similarly, high concentrations of hydrocarbons do not serve as an obstacle to the development of moss cover dominated by sphagnum mosses in areas of cut-off hollows. At the same time, polytrichous and brown mosses were much more sensitive to oil pollution in the form of bitumen crust, and thus avoided areas without cutting.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Reference37 articles.
1. Аветов Н.А., Шишконакова Е.А. Загрязнение нефтью почв таежной зоны Западной Сибири // Бюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева. 2011. № 68.
2. Аветов Н.А., Арзамазова А.В., Кинжаев Р.Р. и др. Методические подходы к оценке нефтезагрязненных земель Среднего Приобья // Проблемы агрохимии и экологии. 2012. № 3.
3. Васильев С.В. Воздействие нефтегазодобывающей промышленности на лесные и болотные экосистемы. Новосибирск, 1998.
4. Вершинин Ю.А., Зубайдуллин А.А. Оценка экологических рисков при загрязнении болот и их рекультивации // Вестн. Нижневартовского гос. гуманитарного ун-та. 2009. № 1.
5. ГОСТ 26423-85 Почвы. Методы определения удельной электрической проводимости, рН и плотного остатка водной вытяжки / ГОСТ № 26423-85.