Affiliation:
1. Moscow Region State Pedagogical University
Abstract
: The article analyzes the features of Byronism and Georgesandism as
sociocultural myths that arose in the post-revolutionary era and embodied the totality of socio-aesthetic gender representations. On the basis of the historical-typological approach, taking into account the trends of modern comparative studies, the
origins of the gender opposition of male and female — the Hero and the Heroine —
are regarded in the poetics of personified myths — Byronism and Georgesandism,
which acquired an all-European scale in European culture of the first half of the 19th
century.
At the Enlightenment stage of mastering the specifics of the intimate and the
public, the development of the ideas of civil society, the destruction of the paradigms
of mental and universal laws of aesthetics, in public life and literature of the 18th
century there was an increase in the gender consciousness of society. In the article
it is correlated with the French tradition — the sentimentalist novel by J.-J. Rousseau
Julia, or the new Eloise and the romantic concepts of the hero and the heroine in the
works of Germain de Stael, where the conflict, antithesis, dichotomy of the feminine
and the masculine began to be artistically meaningful from the standpoint of social
and psychological egalitarianism.
It is proved that Byronism and Georgesandism were complementary and oppositional to each other as socio-aesthetic currents, systems, paradigms, myths, in
which variously interpreted skepticism and the individualistic concept of the Hero,
the poet, are opposed to optimism and utopia, the feminine myth of the Heroine —
in the works and biography of George Sand. The gender originality of typologically
related romantic value ideas is considered: aspiration for the absolute, spiritual
maximalism with a clear priority of the male myth in the image of Byron and his
work — and the female, socialistically marked in George Sand.
Biographical and biographically related material, the work of each in the first
half of the century formed the basis of sociocultural and romantic symbolizations
that characterize and form the gender specificity of the text of romantic culture.
Reference16 articles.
1. Dmitrieva E.E. Jenskij romantizm i teoriya romanticheskogo soobshchestva // Istoriya nemeckoj literatury: Novoe i novejshee vremya / Pod red. EE. Dmitrievoj, A.V. Markina, N.S. Pavlovoj [Jena romanticism and the theory of the romantic community / History of German literature: New and modern times]. M.: RGGU, 2014, pp. 359–367. (In Russ.)
2. Zemon N., Farzh A. Zhenshchiny kak dejstvuyushchie lica istorii / Istoriya zhenshchin na Zapade [Women as historical actors. Western women’s history]. T. 3. 2008, pp. 13–20. (In Russ.)
3. Kozin A.A., Litvinenko N.A., Lunina I.E., Redina O.N. Mifogennyj i mifotvorcheskij potencial obrazov v zarubezhnoj literature XIX veka. Romantizm (CHast’ I) [Mythogenic and myth-creating potential of images in foreign literature of the 19th century. Romanticism. Part 1]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Russkaya filologiya. 2022. № 4, pp. 85–94. (In Russ.)
4. Livergant A. Viktorianki [Victorian women]. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2022. 721 p. (In Russ.)
5. Pahsar’yan N.T Istoriya zarubejnoi literaturi XVII_XVIII vekov [The history of foreign literature of the XVII-XVIII centuries]. URL: pahsaryan-n-t-istoriya-zarubezhnoj-literatury-xvii-xviii-vv-ehlektronnyj-resurs-url-17v-euro-lit-niv-ru-17veuro-lit-pahsaryan-17-18v (accessed 22.11.2022).