Abstract
The oceanographic variation of the central Mexican Pacific (CMP) is mainly driven by the California Current and the Mexican Coastal Current, which generate a convergence zone. Little information is available regarding changes in oceanographic variables at the mesoscale level in the CMP. Therefore, this study characterized 6 oceanographic variables (sea surface temperature, chlorophyll concentration [Chl], primary productivity [PP], diffuse attenuation coefficient [K490], and particulate inorganic/organic carbon concentration [PIC, POC]) in the CMP from 2010 to 2017 and their relationships with El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The variables were standardized to monthly pixel values of 0.08 latitude degrees, and the study area covered 48,846.48 km2. Friedman tests were used to compare the temporal variation in the variables, while Spearman correlations were used to evaluate the relationship between each variable and the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI). A cross-correlation analysis was performed to determine the temporal lag between the oceanographic variables and the MEI. The cyclicity of the variation in the CMP was determined by spectral analysis. All variables showed significant differences between months and years. Two seasons defined by temperature were also detected: a cold season (December–June), in which high values of these variables were observed, and a warm season (July–November), in which low values of these variables were observed. No variables were correlated with the MEI; however, a 4-month time lag was identified between the variables and the MEI. The cyclicity of the variables corresponded to the cold and warm seasons. The cold phase of ENSO increased the values of PP, Chl, and K490 up to 4 times compared to those of other years. Taken together, the observed variation in oceanographic conditions makes the CMP one of the most dynamic coastal regions of the Mexican Pacific.
Publisher
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanologicas
Reference60 articles.
1. Álvarez-Borrego S, Lara-Lara JR. 1991. The physical environment and primary productivity of the Gulf of California. In: Dauphin JP, Simonet BRT (eds.), The Gulf and Peninsular Province of the Californias. Tulsa (OK): AAPG. p. 555-567. http://doi.org/10.1306/M47542C26
2. Alvarez-Borrego SA, Schwartzlose RA. 1979. Masas de agua del Golfo de California = Water masses of the Gulf of California. Cienc Mar. 6(1–2):43-63. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v6i1.350
3. Anderson DM, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM. 2002. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries. 25:704-726. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804901
4. Audzijonyte A, Richards SA, Stuart-Smith RD, Pecl G, Edgar GJ, Barrett NS, Payne N, Blanchard JL. 2020. Fish body sizes change with temperature but not all species shrink with warming. Nat Ecol Evol. 4:809-814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1171-0
5. Badan-Dangon A. 1998. Coastal circulation from the Galápagos to the Gulf of California. In: Robinson AR, Brink, KH (eds.), The Sea, The Global Coastal Ocean Regional Studies and Syntheses, vol. 11. Cambridge (MA): John Wiley and Sons. p. 315-334.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献