Affiliation:
1. Ministry of Internal Affairs of the RA, Yerevan Armenia
Abstract
The author devoted his work to a comparative legal analysis of the issue of importance for the prevention of juvenile delinquency and the resocialization of juveniles, and compulsory educational measures in the context of the former and current criminal codes.
As a result of the conducted research, quantitative and qualitative changes in compulsory educational measures were touched upon, and the positive and negative meanings of these changes were discussed. In particular, the current legislation provides for five compulsory educational measures instead of the previous four, in addition, warning as a compulsory educational measure is generally excluded, and the remaining three are either supplemented or modified in content. Two new measures were envisaged: completion of studies, continuation of studies, admission to work through the mediation of a municipality and participation in a special educational, sports, cultural or social program or event or rehabilitation program in a rehabilitation institution. The first measure was not envisaged for by previous legislation as an independent measure, but was applied in the context of restricting leisure freedom and establishing special requirements for the behavior of juveniles, and the second measure is an innovation in the legislation of the RA.
The results of the study were summarized by the author in the format of conclusions and suggestions of practical importance.
Publisher
Association of Judges of the Republic of Armenia
Reference10 articles.
1. Հ. Խաչատրյան, Անչափահասների խմբային հանցավորություն, Մենագրություն, 2020 թ., էջ 216։
2. Հ. Մ. Խաչատրյան, «Անչափահասների խմբային հանցավորության կանխարգելման հիմախնդիրները ՀՀ-ում», թեկ. ատենախոսություն, էջեր 114-152:
3. ՀՀ քրեական նոր օրենսգրքում տեղ գտած հայեցակարգային մոտեցումերի եվ նոր ինստիտուտների մեկնաբանման ուղեցույց, 2022 թ., էջ 204:
4. “European Rules on Juvenile Offenders Subject to Penalties or Other Measures”, Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Recommendation No. CM/Rec (2008)11, https://sites.unicef.org/tdad/councilofeuropejjrec08(1).pdf
5. T. And V. v. The United Kingdom case of ECHR, Charlotte Walsh.Youth Justice and Neuroscience: A Dual-Use Dilemma//.British Journal of Criminology (2011) 51, էջ 21–39: