Correctness of the computer model and our life

Author:

Kholshchevnikov V. V.1ORCID,Parfenenko A. P.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Fire Academy of Emercom of Russia; National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering; Scientific Research Institute “Federal Research Centre for Projects Evaluation and Consulting Services”

2. National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

Abstract

Introduction. In the last decade, various software products have been created in Russia that claim to be a computer equivalent to the statutory document “Method of determining design values of fire risk in buildings, structures and constructions of different functional fire hazard classes”. In some of them, the complex of the programs completely substituting all sections of this document is given; others concern only modelling of time of evacuation of people and determining, on this basis, the probability of evacuation P ev which value, at not functioning systems of active fire protection (K = 0.8–0.9), shall be equal 0.999.Analysis of results of Determining estimated Time of evacuation in Software and Computing Systems. However, the reference data on which it is possible to check the accuracy of calculations of estimated time of evacuation t e is not given, and the majority of buyers of these systems do not have enough skills for this purpose. Software and computing system salesmen provide demo versions of software to customers, but refuse to disclose the source data on which they are based. They explain this “secrecy” by the fact that the software sold contains a certain KNOW-HOW which is their copyright. Therefore, the purchase and sale is, in fact, based only on the trust of the buyer to the seller. But the universal thing “Try before you trust” makes you look for what to check first and how to do it. What to check first is listed in the technical regulations “On fire safety requirements”: safety of evacuation, its promptness and unhindered access. The article is motivated by these criteria, examples of tragic consequences of their non-fulfillment are given.The authors then show how to perform such a test through the simplest examples. For this purpose, calculation of time of evacuation of a human flow at consecutive change of its density under Fogard Rv programs is made, Sigma PB, Urban; the calculation of the same situations using a simplified analytical model is made “Manually”. The deviations of tp values, obtained by computer programs from the values in the manual сomputation are calculated in percents. The evaluation of these deviations, given in the tables and on the graphs, shows that the developers of software and computing systems change in their calculations the domain area (model) used in the Methodology, i.e. distort the patterns of connection between the parameters of human flows established as a result of scientific discovery.Conclusions and proposals. As a result it is shown that results of the considered commercial software and computing systems considerably underestimate estimated time of evacuation of people, defining it below time of achievement of critical levels of influence by hazards of fire tbs , i.е. create the illusion of fulfilment of the condition: t e,i ≤ tbs . This allows the customer of this software product not to fulfill expensive requirements of fire safety of the facility. Thus, the owners of these software and computing systems mislead the citizens who are in buildings and structures regarding the safety of their health and life.

Publisher

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

Reference102 articles.

1. Kholshchevnikov V.V., Predtechenskiy V.M. Analysis and modeling the relationships between pedestrian flow parameters. International Council for Building. Report No. 14/86/37. 1986; 14.

2. Kholshchevnikov V.V. Foot traffic flows: actual observations, experiments and theory. Fire Bridge: Proceedings of International Conference. Northern Ireland, University of Ulster, 2–6 September 2000. 20.

3. Kholshchevnikov V.V., Samoshin D.A., Galushka N.N. Review of computer programs of modeling the evacuation of buildings and constructions. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2002; 11(5):40-49. (rus.).

4. Kholshevnikov V.V., Samoshyn D.A., Shields T.J., Galushka M.M. Retrospective review of research on pedestrian flows modelling in Russia and perspectives of its development. Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards. Londonderry, UK, University of Ulster, 2003; 907-916.

5. Kholshchevnikov V.V. What is modelled with the use of the theory of mass service. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2003; 12(2):39-40. (rus.).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3