Specific Issues of Criminal Protection in the Field of Genetics: International and Spanish Experience

Author:

Shestak Viktor Anatolievich1,Tsyplakova Alyona Dmitrievna2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Criminal Procedure, Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, Russia

2. Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminology, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Abstract Background: Methods for combining cloning techniques with genetic engineering techniques (gene manipulation) are currently being developed in order to enhance predetermined biological or mental characteristics. Admissibility of conducting research on human embryos is justified by the fact that it will help to improve the human species and free it from serious diseases. However, two competing rights stand in the way of legality of this practice. On the one hand, the right of a human embryo to development and life. On the other hand, the right of mankind to use all scientific means to fight more effectively against diseases and to receive organs and tissues for transplantation to improve the quality of life. Some researchers believe that human life, if regarded as a moral value, cannot be absolute. Aims and Objectives: This paper examines the relevant legislation on both international and national levels and the Spanish doctrine in terms of defining acts against genetics and evaluating effectiveness to criminalize them in order to ensure the balance between medical ethics and community best interests. Materials and Methods: This study is a description paper on gene-manipulation regulation in Spain, the EU and worldwide. It is based primarily on genetic, systematic-functional and systematization methods with regard to special legal ones. Results and Conclusion: There is a wide of international, supranational and national acts that governs gene manipulation and secures society from illegal actions. Still, there are vague issues to revise either by enacting amendments or referencing to doctrine. The perfect way to ensure community interests is to elaborate both.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. Clone?:Ethics and Law Before Human Cloning Granada:Comares;Capella,2000

2. What exactly is an exact copy?And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia;Gogarty;J Med Ethics,2003

3. Calls for cloning ban sell science short;Butler;Nature,1997

4. Human cloning:Ethical issues and legal implications;Jain;Indian J Law Legal Res,2021

5. Why we should ban human cloning;Annas;N Engl J Med,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3