Euthanasia: National and International Experience (Based on the European Court of Human Rights Practice Materials)

Author:

Orlova Olena O.1,Alforova Tetiana M.2,Lezhnieva Tetiana M.2,Chernopiatov Stanislav V.2,Kyrychenko Oleh V.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Legal Disciplines, Faculty of Law, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, Dnipro, Ukraine

2. Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Psychology, Dnipro Humanitarian University, Dnipro, Ukraine

Abstract

Purpose: The relevance of the study is that today, there is no unanimous position on the right to euthanasia implementation. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), in making its decision, relies on the national legislation of the respective state, as there is no single decision on the right to euthanasia in the European space. Therefore, the aim of the article is to comprehensively study the phenomenon of euthanasia, elaborate the decisions of the ECtHR on euthanasia and related rights, and develop recommendations on the possibility of legalizing euthanasia in Ukraine and prospects for the right to die implementation. Methodology: The leading method of research of this issue is comparative and law, which allows to comprehensively consider the right to euthanasia and its positive and negative components and helps to establish trends in the implementation of the outlined phenomenon. Findings: The article analyzes the current state of international and domestic legislation of some states on the use of euthanasia, reveals the meaning of the term “euthanasia,” provides a classification of euthanasia, analyzes the decisions of the ECtHR, and presents examples of national legislation of states within which euthanasia is legalized, the peculiarities of euthanasia recognition in the world are analyzed, as well as the research on the possibility of euthanasia legalization in Ukraine is presented. Value: The materials of the article have practical value for all those interested in euthanasia and the realization of the right to die, as well as for practicing lawyers and judicial authorities.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference13 articles.

1. Biotechnology as factor for the fourth generation of human rights formation;Ivanii;J Hist Cult Art Res,2020

2. Implementing voluntary assisted dying in a major public health service;Booth;Med J Aust,2021

3. Asleep or awake?That is the question…A review of techniques available for monitoring the depth of anaesthesia;Iwanowski;Pol Ann Med,2020

4. Complementary medicine:International experience of functioning and specific features of the application in Ukraine;Samilyk;Wiad Lek,2019

5. Severe pain and suffering as effects of torture:Detection in medical and legal practice;Tavolzhanska;Georgian Med News,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3