Best Practices for the Evaluation and Management of Low Back Pain in Primary Care: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus

Author:

Srinivasan A. V.1,Dureja G. P.2,Banerjee Tapas Kumar3,Chaudhuri Jaydip Ray4,Benny Rajesh5,Archik Shreedhar6,Mascarenhas Amrithlal A.7,Marthala Pradeep Reddy8,Agarwal Amit Kumar9,Shah Dhara10,Rajgopal Jayesh11

Affiliation:

1. Director and Senior Consultant, AVS Clinic, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

2. Director, Delhi Pain Management Centre, New Delhi, India

3. Medical Director and Chief Consultant Neurologist, National Neurosciences Centre, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

4. Department of Neurology, Yashoda Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

5. Senior Consultant Neurologist and Professor of Neurology, Fortis Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

6. Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Lilavati Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

7. Senior Consultant Spine Surgeon, Manipal Hospital Millers Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

8. Director and Chief Arthroplasty Surgeon, Hyderabad Multi Specialty Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

9. Senior Consultant Orthopaedics, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India

10. Head Medical Affairs, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Private Limited-A Viatris Company, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

11. Senior Medical Manager, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Private Limited-A Viatris Company, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: International guidelines for the management of patients with low back pain (LBP) are available, but there are no India-specific guidelines for the diagnosis and management of LBP in primary care. This article aims to provide clinical insights for the diagnosis and treatment of LBP for primary care practitioners in India. Methods: A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to get insights and opinions from a panel of 9 multidisciplinary specialist (neurology, orthopedics, and pain management). In rounds 1 and 2, 203 and 60 statements, respectively, were circulated to the expert panel and they were asked to respond with an “agree” or “disagree” to each statement and provide comments. At least 80% of the experts had to agree for a statement to reach a concordance. More than 80% concordance was reached for 175 and 32 statements in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Round 3 was a direct interaction with the experts. Results: There was good agreement among the expert panelist in round 3 for the consensus-derived statements from the earlier two rounds of the survey. The panel agreed that diagnostic triage is important to exclude specific spinal pathology, routine imaging is not recommended unless suspecting serious pathology, specialist referral is needed for serious pathologies/no improvement in pain with treatment, and management is to be individualized depending on etiology and patient factors. Conclusions: Primary care physicians are the first point of contact for patients with back pain. These consensus recommendations will assist primary care physicians in India to choose an appropriate course of action for managing patients with LBP.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference56 articles.

1. Common clinical practice for low back pain treatment: A Modified Delphi Study;Varrassi;Pain Ther,2021

2. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study;Hoy;Ann Rheum Dis,2014

3. Epidemiology of low back pain: A literature review;Jana;International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health,2019

4. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain;Koes;BMJ,2006

5. Low back pain;Knezevic;Lancet,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3