Affiliation:
1. Department of Pain and Palliative Care, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Background:
Different treatments for discogenic axial back/neck pain or radicular pain to limbs are there from conservative therapies and minimally invasive therapies to open spine surgeries with lots of controversial outcomes. Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) is one of the minimally invasive therapies which is done under local anesthesia and has been successfully performed in many selected patients for their lumbar and cervical disc herniation problems. In PLDD, a part of the nucleus pulposus is vaporized with the help of laser energy to reduce the intradiscal pressure of the diseased discs causing nerve compression. In this case series after a 1-year follow-up, the clinical effectiveness of PLDD with epidural steroid injection is assessed in selected lumbar and cervical disc herniation cases.
Materials and Methods:
Ninety-six patients underwent the PLDD procedure at the cervical and lumbar disc with epidural steroid injections for their disc herniation causing radicular pain in the upper and lower limbs, respectively. The patients were followed at 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The main outcome measures were done through the visual analog scores (VASs) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for upper and lower limb pain.
Results:
The primary outcome showed that there is a significant clinically relevant difference between the two groups at a 1-year follow-up. VAS and mean disability score based on the ODI were significantly lower in cervical disc herniation patients. The reoperation rate in the cervical group is also much less than the lumbar group.
Conclusion:
Like all other surgical modalities for disc herniation, PLDD has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, compared to lumbar disc herniation, it may give better results in cervical disc herniation. In selected cases, combined PLDD with epidural steroid injection can be chosen as a “first-choice-minimally-invasive-treatment,” when standard conservative therapies do not give satisfactory outcome.