Analgesic Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Block versus Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study

Author:

Ray Subrata1,Mitra Anuradha1,Sanyal Ramapati2,Hussain Tabish3,Naz Anjum4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India

2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Tomo Riba Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh, India

3. UT MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA

4. Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, West Bengal, India

Abstract

Abstract Background: Immediate post-operative pain can be severe and is an important outcome measure for patients in shoulder arthroscopic surgeries. Interscalene block is the most widely used and studied technique for post shoulder arthroscopy pain relief and is associated with certain unpleasant adverse effects. Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been suggested as an alternative and safer block. As the suprascapular nerve contributes to 70% of the sensory nerve supply to the shoulder joint, and the axillary circumflex nerve is the other major nerve contributing to 25%; therefore, a combined block of these two nerves should provide more effective pain relief than SSNB alone. Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of combined SSNB and axillary nerve block (ANB) with SSNB alone for analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy in terms of level of pain scores, total analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction in 24 h. Methods: Forty-one patients posted for shoulder arthroscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, Group S (n = 20) receiving SSNB and Group C (n = 21) receiving combined SSNB and ANB. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and at the time of first demand, total consumption of analgesics in 24 h and patient satisfaction score at 12 and 24 h were noted. Statistical Analysis: The data was analyzed by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test using Graph Pad PRISM 9, a p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: The VAS scores both at rest and during movement were significantly less in Group C at 1, 6, 12 h, and at the time of the first demand of analgesic (p<0.05). Compared to Group S, Group C had a longer pain-free duration (154.3 ± 11.41 min vs. 36.60 ± 6.553 min; P < 0.001) and lesser cumulative consumption of pethidine (300.0 ± 8.894 mg vs. 336.8 ± 13.27 mg; P = 0.0256). The satisfaction level was better in Group C at 12 h (P = 0.002) but comparable to the Group S at 24 h (P = 0.0673). Conclusion: Combined SSNB and ANB provided better pain relief in first 12 h, better patient satisfaction in the first 12 h and decreased overall consumption of analgesics in the first 24 h compared to SSNB alone.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3