Global Perspectives on Innovations in Emergency Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study

Author:

Visclosky Timothy12,Funk Tara2,Agubosim Chinonso1,Chaou Chung-Hsien3,Mahajan Prashant12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

Abstract

Introduction: In mid-2020, the Emergency Medicine Education and Research by Global Experts (EMERGE) network surveyed the emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We demonstrated that innovative measures were being generated at unprecedented rates. Our aim was to build on these findings to develop the first theoretical model with utility in assessing and developing emergency innovations. Methods: Phase 1 of a two-phase, explanatory sequential mixed methods study was a secondary analysis of the original EMERGE survey. Phase 2 involved follow-up interviews of a purposeful sample of 15 of the original survey respondents, representing 12 countries and all 6 World Health Organization regions. Thematic analysis was performed by three members of the research team. Results: Innovation is a nonlinear process in which ideas are developed, implemented, refined, and spread. Ideas grew from departmental needs or the spread of successful innovations from other sites. Development was highly localized, influenced by institutional and regional factors. Obtaining buy-in from relevant stakeholders and addressing various barriers were essential to implementation. The majority of innovations then underwent a process of evolution before some were spread to other institutions through a largely unidirectional flow of information. Conclusions: This study proposes the first model for emergency innovation processes and highlights multiple areas for improvement. Understanding how to prioritize departmental needs and the barriers may streamline development and implementation. Furthermore, the apparent unidirectional flow of information demonstrated by our participants suggests both an opportunity and a need for improved information systems. We present a framework for further research and an outline for innovation management.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference16 articles.

1. Conceptualizing the innovation process towards the ‘active innovation paradigm’ – Trends and outlook;Meissner;J Innov Entrep,2016

2. Innovations in health care-a conceptual framework;Flessa;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021

3. History of the development of international emergency medicine;Alagappan;Emerg Med Clin North Am,2005

4. The 2019 model of the clinical practice of emergency medicine;Beeson;J Emerg Med,2020

5. Innovations to reduce demand and crowding in emergency care; a review study;Mason;Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3