Influence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Bystander-victim Relationship on the Willingness of Laypeople and Health-care Providers to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Author:

Boonmak Suhattaya1,Mitsungnern Thapanawong2,Boonmak Pimmada1,Boonmak Polpun1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) reduces mortality from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The willingness to perform CPR (W-CPR) is also critical. Uncertain effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on W-CPR were reported. Our objectives aim to examine W-CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the influence of the bystander-victim relationship, bystander characteristics, and CPR background on the W-CPR of laypeople and healthcare providers (HCPs). Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between August 2020 and November 2020 among Thai laypeople and HCPs. A structured questionnaire was given to volunteers as an online survey. We recorded W-conventional CPR (W-C-CPR), W-compression-only CPR (W-CO-CPR), chest compression, automated external defibrillator (AED), mouth-to-mouth, face shield, and pocket mask ventilation on family members (FMs), acquaintances, and strangers during the study (pandemic) and in nonpandemic situation and analyzed. Results: We included 419 laypeople and 716 HCPs. During the pandemic, laypeople expressed less willingness in all interventions (P < 0.05) except W-CO-CPR in FMs and AED in FMs and acquaintances. HCPs were less willing to any interventions (P < 0.05). Laypeople showed comparable W-C-CPR and W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances but less among strangers (P < 0.05). HCPs’ W-CPR differed significantly depending on their relationship (P < 0.05), except W-CO-CPR between FMs and acquaintances. CPR self-efficacy, single marital status, CPR experience, and HCPs reported higher W-CO-CPR in FMs. Conclusion: Participants were less W-CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic on all recipients (laypeople: 2.8%–21.0%, HCPs: 7.6%–31.2%), except for laypeople with FMs. The recipient’s relationship was more critical in W-C-CPR than in W-CO-CPR, especially in HCPs.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3