Piroxicam gel versus injectable platelet rich fibrin in the treatment of stage III periodontitis

Author:

Khallaf Nourhan T.1,Sabra Reda Saber1,Ghoraba Sahar M.1,Attia Mohamed Attia Saad2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta, Egypt

2. Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Abstract

Background In view of the importance and prevalence of chronic periodontitis, there is still an urgent need to search for an effective therapy that is less expensive, easy to use, and readily available with no side effects. Injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) and piroxicam were considered as possible treatment options of periodontitis. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of piroxicam gel versus i-PRF in treatment of stage III periodontitis. Materials and method The current study was carried out as a randomized clinical trial. The participants diagnosed as having stage III, grade B periodontitis were selected from the patients attending Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University. The selected individuals randomly assigned into two groups (by means of a sealed envelope via masked supervisor): group I and group II. Forty sites (the deepest periodontal pockets) were selected. Twenty sites from GI was treated by piroxicam gel and 20 sites in GII were treated by i-PRF. The application was done 2 weeks after scaling and root planing and applied for five times one application every 2 weeks over 10 weeks. The comparison was assessed clinically and immunologically. Clinically, via recorded: probing pocket depth, clinical attachment loss, and bleeding on probing. Immunologically, via measuring: the levels of matrix metalloproteinases-8 in gingival cervical fluid samples. Clinical and immunological were recorded at baseline (before scaling and root planing), 4 weeks (2 weeks after first application), 8 weeks (at fourth application), and 12 weeks (2 weeks after the last application). Results Both groups showed significant improvement in all clinical and immunological parameters. Comparing GI and GII at each follow-up time point, there was significant amelioration in all assessed parameters in favor to GII. Conclusion The use of i-PRF is preferred over the use of piroxicam gel in the treatment of stage III chronic periodontitis, as it gives better clinical and immunological results.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference30 articles.

1. Effect of periodontal therapy on crevicular fluid interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 levels in chronic periodontitis;Goutoudi;Int J Dent,2012

2. Local drug delivery drugs and systems;Sudhakar;Int J Appl Dent Sci,2020

3. Importance of virulence factors for the persistence of oral bacteria in the inflamed gingival crevice and in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease;Dahlen;J Clin Med,2019

4. Advanced local drug delivery approaches for periodontitis:a strategic intervention;Patel;Res Rev,2018

5. Non-surgical pocket therapy:mechanical;Cobb;Ann Periodontol,1996

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3