Assessment of soft- and hard-tissue changes following combined anterior segmental bi-jaw orthognathic surgery

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Anterior segmental Bi-jaw orthognathic surgery is indicated primarily for the correction of dentoalveolar protrusion. They are also indicated for correcting apertognathia, closing interproximal spaces between segments and can be incorporated with other osteotomies to obtain better results. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the soft- and hard-tissue changes in patients who underwent combined anterior segmental bi-jaw orthognathic surgery. Settings and Design: To compare and evaluate soft- and hard-tissue changes before and after combined anterior segmental bi-jaw orthognathic surgery by assessing (a) parameters in vertical dimension and (b) parameters in horizontal dimension and patient satisfaction was also assessed following surgery at 6 months’ time interval. Materials and Methods: It is a prospective, single center and analytical study with sample size of 20 patients. It required routine setup for orthognathic surgery and manual tracing of lateral cephalograms. The surgical outcomes were assessed by hard tissue (Sella Nasion Point A (SNA) angle, Sella Nasion Point B (SNB) angle, Point A Nasion Point B (ANB) angle, NAPg, U1-NF, L1-MP angles; NA, NB, B-Pg, Nasion-Anterior nasal spine (N-ANS) distance, Anterior nasal spine-Gnathion (ANS-Gn) distance, and overjet and overbite) and soft tissue (facial convexity, NL, LM angles; LM fold, UL and LL protrusions, Upper lip length (ULL), Lower lip length (LLL), Sn-A, Si-B, Pg-Pg*, Ls-U1, Li-L1 distances, interlabial gap, and U1 exposure) variables pre and postsurgery. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics involved the mean and standard deviation, and recorded data were subjected to the statistical analysis using IBM SPSS 20 statistical package. The paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient were used. The level of significance P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant and P < 0.01 as very significant. Results: Overall improvement after surgery in both hard- and soft-tissue parameters was observed and significant changes were seen in every variable, except Si-B (P > 0.05). Correlations between soft- and hard-tissue changes were significant in both sagittal and vertical planes. Patients’ satisfaction score showed that all patients had the high overall rate of satisfaction. Conclusions: Our study concludes that combined anterior segmental bimaxillary orthognathic surgery is a simple technique with minimal postoperative complications and limited relapse. The changes in facial esthetics and occlusion following orthognathic surgery depend highly on the stability achieved during the postoperative period.