The effect of different reciprocating angles on debris extrusion produced by R-Motion files – An in vitro study

Author:

Al-Omari Taher Mohammed Nabil1,Arican Burcin2,Ates Ayfer Atav3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

2. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey

3. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Introduction: Extrusion of debris resulting from canal preparation is an important topic of interest for dentists. This study assessed the performance of the R-Motion (RM) and Reciproc Blue (RB) systems on extracted teeth, for both apically extruded debris and time of preparation. Materials and Methods: Sixty mandibular premolar teeth with straight match canal anatomy were indiscriminately allocated to one of the three groups: RM-WO (WaveOne ALL-mode), RM-R (Reciproc ALL-mode), and RB with glide path (R ALL-mode). The amount of extruded debris apically was collected in preweighed plastic laboratory tubes during treatment, and the procedure time was recorded. The mean values of extruded debris were calculated by subtracting the postinstrumentation weight of tubes from the preinstrumentation weight. The data were statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey pairwise comparison tests. Results: Extrusion of debris was observed with all the samples. The RM group had less apical extrusion of debris compared to the RB group. Extruded debris in the RM-R group was numerically less than in the RM-WO group (P > 0.05) and significantly less than in the RB group (P < 0.05) (one-way ANOVA test; P < 0.05). In both motions, the preparation time required by RB was equal to that required by the RM file (One-way ANOVA test; P > 0.05). Conclusions: All samples showed extrusion of debris to some extent, irrespective of the motion used. RM-R was associated with the least amount of extruded debris.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3