The adherence to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2018 guidelines in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and its impact on survival

Author:

Manne Ashish1,Mulekar Madhuri2,Escobar Daisy3,Prodduturvar Pranitha4,Fahmawi Yazan3,Henderson Phillip5,Abdul-Rahim Osama6,Hussain Zeiad6,Liles Spencer7,Fonseca Annabelle7,Howard John Harrison7,Mneimneh Wadad8,Gilbert Robert9,Alkharabsheh Omar10,Pai Sachin10,White Zachary B11,Nelson Cindy10,Khushman Moh’d10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

2. Departments of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA

3. Department of Internal Medicine, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Mayoclinic, Rochester, MN, USA

5. Gastroenterology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA

6. Interventional Radiology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA

7. Surgical Oncology, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA

8. Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

9. Radiation Oncology, The University of South Alabama, Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL, USA

10. Medical Oncology, The University of South Alabama, Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL, USA

11. College of Medicine, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: In two Korean and Italian studies, the adherence rate (AR) to ASSLD 2005 guidelines in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 60%. In a US study, the AR to American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) 2005 guidelines was 73.3%, 26.8%, 25.3%, and 58.8% for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A, B, C, and D, respectively, and nonadherence to guidelines was associated with longer overall survival (OS) in patients with BCLC Stage D. Here, we explored the AR to AASLD 2018 guidelines and its impact on OS. Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, 148 unique treatment-naïve patients with HCC were identified. Patients were staged according to the BCLC staging system and their AR to AASLD 2018 guidelines was noted. OS was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Survivals among patients from different groups was compared using Log-rank test. Results: The overall AR to AASLD 2018 guidelines was 83%. The AR for BCLC Stages 0, A, B, C, and D were 100%, 97%, 77%, 77%, and 38%, respectively. In patients with BCLC Stage D, the OS of patients treated with modalities adherent versus nonadherent to AASLD 2018 guidelines was 0.03 vs. 5.2 months (P = 0.0005). Otherwise, adherence versus nonadherence to AASLD 2018 guidelines showed no statistically significant differences in OS for patients with BCLC Stages 0, A, B, and C. Conclusion: The overall AR to AASLD 2018 guidelines was 83%. Nonadherence to AASLD 2018 guidelines in patients with BCLC Stage D translated into better OS.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3