A comparison of the WHO 2004 and WHO 2017 thyroid tumor classifications

Author:

Patel Nirali1,Bavikar Rupali1,Lad Yesha Parimalbhai1,Singh Madhuri1,Dharwadkar Arpana1,Viswanathan Vidya1

Affiliation:

1. Department of pathology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri Pune, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Introduction: The category of borderline malignancy or unknown malignant potential was added to the WHO’s 2017 classification of thyroid tumours. A new histological variety of papillary tumours and Hurthle cell tumours was given as a separate entity. The classification has also adopted the Turin criteria for histological diagnosis of poorly differentiated cancer (PDC). Settings and Design: Descriptive study Methods and Material: From July 2018 to June 2022, 200 thyroid neoplasm patients at a tertiary care facility in western Maharashtra were participated in the prospective research over a period of 4 years. Statistical Analysis Used: The descriptive statistics were used to analyse the collected data. Aim: This study was undertaken to compare the old (2004) and new (2016) WHO classifications and their importance in the treatment of thyroid malignancies. Results: Out of 200 cases, the age range of 31 to 40 years had the greatest number of cases. The ratio of females to males was 5:1. In our study, according to the WHO 2004 classification, malignant tumours comprised 57.5% of the cases, while benign tumours 42.5% of the cases. When tumours were subcategorized, the most frequent benign tumour was follicular adenoma (43.5%) and malignant tumour was papillary thyroid carcinoma (37%). Malignant tumours made up 47.5% of the cases when the tumours were reclassified using the revised WHO 2017 classification, followed by borderline tumours with 27.5% of the cases and benign tumours with 25% of the cases. The most frequent borderline tumour was NIFTP (Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features) (17.5%), the most prevalent malignant tumour was papillary carcinoma (including its variant) (32%), and the most frequent benign tumour was follicular adenoma (27%). Conclusion: We concluded that the inclusion of the Boderline Category in the new WHO classification significantly improved thyroid cancer management. WHO 2017 classification prevents under diagnosis (in the case of benign tumors) and over diagnosis (in the case of malignant tumors).

Publisher

Medknow

Reference13 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2014;Siegel;CA:A Cancer J Clin,2014

2. How to handle borderline/precursor thyroid tumors in management of patients with thyroid nodules;Kakudo;Gland Surg,2018

3. A study of histopathological spectrum of thyroid lesions;Prabha;Int J Sci Stud,2019

4. Histopathological pattern of diagnosis in patients undergoing thyroid operations;Sushel;Rawal Med J,2009

5. A study of clinicopathological characteristics of thyroid carcinoma at a Tertiary Care Center;Shah;J Cancer Res Ther,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3