Comparison of magnetic seed and RFID methods in the localization of non-palpable breast lesions

Author:

Sanli Ahmet Necati1,Tekcan Sanli Deniz E.23,Golshan Mehra4,Sezgin Efe5,Celik Varol6,Aydogan Fatih78

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Abdulkadir Yuksel State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey

2. Department of Radiology, Sahinbey Research and Practice Hospital, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey

3. Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Vocational School of Health Services, Istanbul Rumeli University, Istanbul, Turkey

4. Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, United States of America

5. Department of Food Engineering, Laboratory of Nutrigenomics and Epidemiology, Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey

6. Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey

7. Breast Health Center, Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

8. Department of General Sugery, Faculty of Medicine, Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Many methods have been developed for localizing non-palpable breast lesions. This study investigated the success rate and surgical results of the magnetic seed (Magseed) and radiofrequency identification (RFID) method, which are relatively new compared to standard wire-guided localizations. Materials and Methods: 20 simulation (10 Magseed, 10 RFID) models were created using turkey breasts and raisins. Raisins containing magnetic seed and RFID tags were placed on the turkey breast. Sentimag® probe was used for the Magseed group, and Faxitron LOCalizer™ System device was used in the RFID group. Both methods were evaluated in terms of accuracy in detecting breast lesion localization, operation times, excised tissue weights, total resection volume, surgical margin negativity, and re-excision rates. Results: Lesion localization success in both techniques was 100%. While procedure times were statistically significantly shorter in the Magseed group, incision lengths were shorter in the RFID group (P = 0.013, P = 0.007, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups for the weight of the removed parts, total resection volume, and surgical margin distance (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In this feasibility study, it was concluded that neither the RFID nor Magseed methods had a significant advantage over each other, in terms of localization detection and surgical margin negativity, and both methods could be used successfully for localization.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3