Dose–Effect Relationship of Motor Nerve Inexcitability on Outcome in Guillain–Barré Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Author:

Kumar Mritunjai1,Tiwari Ashutosh1,Kumar Shakti2,Singh Rajni3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

2. Department of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract

Objective: One or more inexcitable motor (IM) nerves are common during electrodiagnostic (EDx) study in Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS). This study assessed the dose–effect relationship of IM nerves on outcome in patients with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and acute motor and/or sensory axonal neuropathy (AMAN and AMSAN). Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight GBS patients admitted during May 2018–June 2023 underwent detailed clinical evaluation and EDx study. Admission and follow-up disability were assessed on a 0–10 Clinical Grading Scale (CGS). Outcome was recovery at 6 months, defined as good (CGS <3) and poor (CGS ≥3). Binary multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination was used to calculate independent predictors of outcome. Results: Proportion of patients with complete recovery decreased significantly with increasing numbers of IM nerves (P < 0.01). Seventy-six patients were followed for 6 months. Among patients with IM nerves (n = 28), complete recovery was similar between AIDP and axonal GBS (70% vs. 50%, respectively; P = 0.40). However, in patients with recordable compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in all the motor nerves (n = 26), axonal GBS had significantly poor recovery compared to AIDP (75% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.01). Among patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg; n = 42), poor recovery was seen in 53.6% with IM nerves compared to 35.7% without (P = 0.28), while it was 37.5% versus 5.6% (P = 0.04), respectively, in those who did not receive IVIg (n = 34). However, only admission disability (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–0.97; P = 0.007) was found to be an independent predictor of outcome. Conclusion: Although increasing numbers of IM nerves were associated with poor outcome on univariate analysis, they did not predict 6 months’ outcome independently. Outcome did not differ between axonal GBS and AIDP among those with IM nerves. IVIg improved outcome in patients with IM nerves.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3