Prescription Audit of the Outpatient Department of an Ophthalmic Tertiary Care Public Sector Hospital

Author:

Sahran Deepti1,Seth Sankalp2,Gupta Shakti Kumar3,Dada Tanuj4,Pandey R. M.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hospital Administration, AFMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Command Hospital (SC), Pune, Maharashtra, India

3. Director, AIIMS, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India

4. Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. R. P. Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

5. Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Prescription audit is a type of vigilance activity, which is beneficial in clinical practice in terms of reducing the burden of disease because of medication errors. The aim of the audit was to study the prescribing practices of the outpatient department of an ophthalmic tertiary care public sector hospital. The objectives were to assess the drug use pattern and to recommend suggestions, if any, to improve the prescribing practices. This was a prospective, cross-sectional descriptive study. Materials and Methods: A study was conducted over a period of 1 month (February) to audit the ophthalmic prescriptions received at free generic pharmacy of the tertiary hospital. Data was collected using a predetermined sample size (625) and random sampling strategy. Audit of prescriptions was done and WHO drug prescription and usage indicators were analyzed. Statistical Analysis Used: The data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and Strata 11. Results: Out of randomly selected 625 prescriptions, patient identification details were not properly mentioned in 23% of prescriptions. Some errors were, missing name in 8 (1.28%), missing age in 68 (10.88%), and missing gender in 65 (10.4%) prescriptions. Regarding drug prescription indicators, the doses and correct strength of drug was mentioned in 7 (1.12%) prescriptions and the route of administration of drug was not written in 17 (2.72%) prescriptions. Out of the total 1543 drugs prescribed, only 134 (8.68%) drugs were prescribed in generic form. One hundred (6.48%) drugs were prescribed from the WHO Essential Drug Formulary (EDF), 115 (7.45%) drugs were prescribed from the National EDF, and a total of 129 (8.36%) drugs were prescribed in the form of fixed-drug combinations. An average of 2.47 ± 1.51 drugs were prescribed per patient. Polypharmacy was not significant as more than five drugs were prescribed in only 4% of prescriptions. Conclusions: Prescription writing errors were common which include incorrect mention of patient details, route of administration, and correct dose and strength of drugs. Awareness against polypharmacy was high. Efforts should be taken to promote the usage of generic form of drugs. Standardization of prescription writing and regular conduct of audits is the way forward.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference21 articles.

1. Rational use of drugs and irrational drug combinations;Brahma;Internet J Pharmacol,2012

2. Promoting rational prescribing:An international perspective;Hogerzeil;Br J Clin Pharmacol,1995

3. Identification and quantification of prescription errors;Mohan;Med J Armed Forces India,2014

4. Rationality of prescription writing;Panchbhai;Indian J Pharm Educ Res,2013

5. Safer Prescribing;Fox;Workbook-Section 1, Prescription Writing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3