Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): promise or panacea?

Author:

Busetto Gian Maria12,Checchia Andrea123,Recchia Marco123,Tocci Edoardo12,Falagario Ugo G1,Annunziata Gennaro3,Annese Pasquale2,d’Altilia Nicola2,Mancini Vito2,Ferro Matteo4,Crocetto Felice5,Tataru Octavian Sabin6,Gianfrancesco Luca Di7,Porreca Angelo7,Del Giudice Francesco8,Berardinis Ettore De8,Bettocchi Carlo12,Cormio Luigi19,Carrieri Giuseppe12

Affiliation:

1. University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy

2. Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy

3. Urology Unit, “G. Tatarella” Hospital, Cerignola 71042, Italy

4. Urology Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy

5. University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80126, Italy

6. G. E. Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures 540142, Romania

7. Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) IRCCS, Padua 35128, Italy

8. Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Roma 00161, Italy

9. Urology Unit, “L. Bonomo” Hospital, Andria 76123, Italy

Abstract

Abstract The increasing importance of treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), while avoiding side effects and maintaining sexual function, has allowed for the development of minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs). Recently, the European Association of Urology guidelines reported a paradigm shift from the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to the management of nonneurogenic male LUTS. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the most commonly used MISTs: ablative techniques such as aquablation, prostatic artery embolization, water vapor energy, and transperineal prostate laser ablation, and nonablative techniques such as prostatic urethral lift and temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTIND). MISTs are becoming a new promise, even if clinical trials with longer follow-up are still lacking. Most of them are still under investigation and, to date, only a few options have been given as a recommendation for use. They cannot be considered as standard of care and are not suitable for all patients. Advantages and disadvantages should be underlined, without forgetting our objective: treatment of LUTS and re-treatment avoidance.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Urology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3