Assessment of Enamel Surface Using Scanning Electron Microscope After Debonding Conventional and Self-Ligating Metal and Ceramic Brackets: An In Vitro Study

Author:

Lishna Karalikkattil T1,Shaloob Muhamed1,Antony Vincy1,Roshan Gazanafer1,Parayaruthottam Prathapan2,Mohammed Nayaz VP1,Raheesh Muhammed1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MES Dental College, Perinthalmanna, India

2. Department of Orthodontics, Govt Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

Abstract

Abstract Aims: Minimal enamel loss during bonding and debonding operations is ideal for preserving the enamel surface in fixed orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to assess the enamel surface after debonding conventional and self-ligating metal and ceramic brackets and compare their enamel damage index (EDI) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two maxillary first premolar teeth were divided into four equal groups of eight teeth each. According to the type of brackets used, the teeth were set on acrylic blocks that were color-coded: Conventional metal brackets (ORMCO MINI 2000), Self-ligating metal brackets (ORMCO DAMON Q), conventional ceramic brackets (ORMCO SYMETRI CLEAR), and self-ligating Ceramic brackets (ORMCO DAMON CLEAR). After debonding was done using a straight debonding plier, the tooth surfaces were examined by SEM. The ARI and EDI were then evaluated. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used in inferential statistics to determine differences between the groups. The association between the ARI and the EDI was determined using the Pearson correlation test. Results: The ARI revealed lower values for teeth bonded with traditional ceramic brackets, along with higher scores in the EDI. This suggests that the enamel-resin interface was the primary site of bond failure, potentially leading to iatrogenic tooth surface damage from ceramic bracket debonding. Conversely, self-ligating stainless-steel brackets had the lowest EDI scores and higher ARI values, suggesting that the resin-bracket interface was the primary site of bond failure. Additionally, this group showed minimal to no enamel damage, with only a few enamel cracks observed. Conclusion: Self-ligating metal brackets showed the highest ARI scores and lowest EDI scores, whereas conventional ceramic brackets presented with lowest ARI scores and highest EDI scores. The enamel surfaces attached with ceramic brackets showed greater enamel cracks upon SEM analysis.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference35 articles.

1. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets;Kitahara-Céia;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2008

2. Assessment of enamel loss after debonding of ceramic, composite plastic and metal brackets-an in vitro study;Premkumar;J Contemp Orthod,2019

3. SEM-evaluation of enamel surfaces after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances;Schuler;Am J Dent,2003

4. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch enamel pretreatment;Årtun;Am J Orthod,1984

5. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket;Mundstock;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3