Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Abdominal Hysterectomy in Gynecological Disease(s): An Overview

Author:

Agarwal Mukta1,Sinha* Shivangni1,Haripriya H.2,Kokkayil Prathyusha3,Singh Shruti1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India

2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India

3. Department of Microbiology, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an unsettled complication seen in any surgery. The aim of this study is to assess the rate of postoperative SSIs between total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Can the rate of SSI be reduced with the use of a laparoscopic mode of hysterectomy over abdominal? Materials and Methods: It was a retrospective comparative study. The study was conducted in the obstetrics and gynecology department at a tertiary care center from June 2016 to March 2020. A total of 300 patients who underwent hysterectomy either via laparoscopic or abdominal route were included in the study. They were subdivided into two groups: a total of 167 underwent TLH (Group 1) and 133 had TAH (Group 2). The results were compared. It included the age and body mass index of the patient, indication of surgery, size of the uterus, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative SSIs, duration of hospital stay, and readmission rates. Results: It was found a high rate of SSI in TAH (82.4% vs. 17.6%, P < 0.001, Cramer’s V-0.18), the operative time taken (75 ± 25 min vs. 128 ± 52 min, P < 0.001), and the mean blood loss during TLH (110 ± 30 ml vs. 160 ± 116 ml, P < 0.001) was found significant for patients. The hospital stay after TLH was found to be significantly shorter (4 ± 2.47 days vs. 7 ± 2.43, P < 0.001). Conclusion: TLH has improved the psychological, physical, and financial burden on the health care department. Thus, it has proved a preferred route over TAH.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference17 articles.

1. LAVH or TAH –Choosing it wise and making it safe;Nambiar;Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol,2016

2. Financial and quality-of-life burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding among women agreeing to obtain surgical treatment;Frick;Womens Health Issues,2009

3. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a retrospective study at a tertiary hospital;Aboulfotouh;Gynecol Surg,2020

4. Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes:A systematic review in six European countries;Badia;J Hosp Infect,2017

5. Postoperative abdominal wound infection –Epidemiology, risk factors, identification, and management;Azoury;Chronic Wound Care Manage Res,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3