Checking For Reliability and Accuracy Measuring Point of Care Capillary Blood Glucose Using Glucometers Vs Venous Blood Glucose in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Hospital Based Cross-sectional Study

Author:

Prabhakar Manish Chandra1,Halder Pritam1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India

Abstract

Background: Health-care professionals routinely measure blood glucose of all critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU). The traditional reference standard, venous blood glucose requires venipuncture, and laboratories usually return the test results after 60 min. We wondered if a point of care (POC) capillary glucose measured by glucometer could be as accurate and reliable as blood venous glucose. Methods: We studied consecutive patients admitted to an ICU between May 1, 2009, and May 10, 2009. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of two-POC glucometers with laboratory venous glucose, the reference standard. We used Bland–Altman plots and the Clark error grid method to analyze the results. Results: This study included a total of 110 patients 38 (34%) women; mean age 52.1 years (standard deviation [SD] =17.3); range = 14–85 years. Fourteen patients (12%) were known to have diabetes. The mean glucose value (glucometer 1) was 152.9 mg/dL (SD = 83.1); range = 48–501 mg/dL; that by glucometer 2 was 152.2 mg/dL (SD = 76.2); range = 30–458 mg/dL and by the laboratory was 148.6 mg/dL (SD = 81.5); range = 52–480 mg/dL. Of the 110 subjects, 2 (2%) had blood glucose below 70 mg/dL; 85 (77%) between 70 and 180 mg/dL; and 23 (21%) had blood glucose exceeding 180 mg/dL. The Bland–Altman plot showed a bias of 4 mg% (95% confidence intervals = −9.8–+1.1); and the limits of agreement were −63 and +54 mg%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the two glucometers was 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. The error grid analysis showed that 80% (78/110) of samples lay within Zone A, 22 (110) in Zone B, and 1% (1/110) in Zone C. Conclusions: POC glucose, measured by glucometers was in agreement with the venous glucose estimation. Both glucometers were equally accurate and performed uniformly well across the wide range of blood glucose values.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3