Influence of Saliva Collection Method on the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Antibodies in the Saliva: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Kheur Supriya1,Sanap Avinash2,Raut Chandrashekhar3,Shekatkar Madhura1,Kharat Avinash2,Barthwal Madhusudan4,Bhawalkar Jitendra5,Kheur Mohit6,Bhonde Ramesh2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, India

2. Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, India

3. Central Research Facility, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, India

4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, India

5. Department of Community Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, India

6. Department of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, M. A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences, Pune, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Although the nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) are considered as the gold standard specimen for the clinical diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), they pose several limitations such as the high risk of exposure, discomfort to the patients, and requirement of trained healthcare professionals. Aim: This study aimed to investigate “saliva” as an alternate source and the influence of the method of saliva collection on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients were screened for the COVID-19 infection with NPS. Saliva was collected from the same patients by four different methods (expectoration, drooling, gargling, and using salivary swabs) and stored at 80°C. Saliva samples of the patients who were detected positive for SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed for viral load by RT-qPCR and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels by ELISA. Results: Out of 350 patients screened, 43 patients were included in the study, which were found to be positive for COVID-19 as evidenced by RT-PCR in the NPS (positivity rate-12.2%). Expectorated saliva exhibited 78.5% sensitivity and drooling method showed 22.2% sensitivity, whereas the salivary swab and gargling method yielded 21.42% and 16.66% sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection was reduced to 18.1% and 0.0% in the saliva collected by salivary swab and gargling method above the cycle threshold value 25.0 (NPS). Conclusion: Interestingly, salivary IgG showed better concordance with the viral load as compared to the serum IgG (R20.23 vs 0.04, P = 0.044). Expectorated saliva is a better specimen as compared to the drooling, gargling, and salivary swabs for SARS-CoV-2 viral detection for the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3