Validation of three weight gain-based algorithms as a screening tool to detect retinopathy of prematurity: A multicenter study

Author:

Raffa Lina12,Alamri Aliaa3,Alosaimi Amal4,Alessa Sarah12,Alharbi Suzan5,Ahmedhussain Huda12,Almarzouki Hashem678,AlQurashi Mansour689

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

3. Department of Pediatrics, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Ophthalmology, Jeddah Eye Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

6. College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

7. Department of Ophthalmology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

8. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

9. Department of Pediatrics, Neonatology Division, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Western Region, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Purpose: Screening guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are updated frequently to help clinicians identify infants at risk of type 1 ROP. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of three different predictive algorithms—WINROP, ROPScore, and CO-ROP—in detecting ROP in preterm infants in a developing country. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 386 preterm infants from two centers between 2015 and 2021. Neonates with gestational age ≤30 weeks and/or birth weight ≤1500 g who underwent ROP screening were included. Results: One hundred twenty-three neonates (31.9%) developed ROP. The sensitivity to identify type 1 ROP was as follows: WINROP, 100%; ROPScore, 100%; and CO-ROP, 92.3%. The specificity was 28% for WINROP, 1.4% for ROPScore, and 19.3% for CO-ROP. CO-ROP missed two neonates with type 1 ROP. WINROP provided the best performance for type 1 ROP with an area under the curve score at 0.61. Conclusion: The sensitivity was at 100% for WINROP and ROPScore for type 1 ROP; however, specificity was quite low for both algorithms. Highly specific algorithms tailored to our population may serve as a useful adjunctive tool to detect preterm infants at risk of sight-threatening ROP.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Ophthalmology

Reference34 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3