Correlation between different retinal layers with visual acuity in diabetic retinopathy patients with clinically significant macular edema

Author:

Parveen Shama1,Mishra Deepak1,Gurnani Bharat2,Kaur Kirandeep3,Ziada Hossameldin A4,Srivastav Tanmay5,Bhushan Prashant1

Affiliation:

1. Senior Resident, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

2. Cornea, Cataract and Refactive Surgery, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalya, Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, India

3. Cornea, Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalya, Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, India

4. Cornea and Refractive Unit, Al-Azhar University, Egypt

5. Department of Ophthalmology, Maa Vindhyavasini Autonomous State Medical College Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Purpose: To study the corelation between outer retinal layer thickness (ORL), outer photoreceptor segment thickness (PROS), and central macular thickness (CMT) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients having clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and compare these parameters with normal patients. Methods: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, observational, comparative study done during the period of January to May 2019. The study included 60 eyes of 36 patients. The patient population was segregated into two Groups: Group I (30 normal eyes of 15 normal patients) and Group II (30 eyes of 21 diabetic patients) with CSME. The comparison between ORL, PROS, and CMT was made between both the groups, and the correlation between ORL thickness, PROS thickness, and CMT with BCVA in Group II was studied. Results: The mean age in Group I was 52.6+10.66 years, and 53.42+8.15 years in Group II. The male/female ratio was 1.1:1 in Group I and 4:3 in Group II. The mean CMT was greater in Group II (330.13 ± 37.01) than in Group I (222.20 ± 12.30). The mean ORL thickness was greater in Group I (97.73 ± 6.92) than in Group II (80.63 ± 9.03). The PROS thickness was statistically significant in Group I (35.05 ± 3.4) than in Group II (28.57 ± 3.53). There was a strong correlation between BCVA and ORL thickness (r = −0.580, P < 0.001) and more strong correlation between BCVA and PROS thickness in Group II (r = −0.611, P < 0.000). There was a moderate correlation between BCVA and CMT (r = 0.410, P < 0.025), and all results were statistically significant. Conclusion: Both ORL and PROS thickness were greater in healthy normal eyes than in eyes with CSME. BCVA was strongly correlated with PROS and ORL thickness and moderately associated with CMT.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Ophthalmology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3