Locality is the strongest predictor of expert performance in image-based differentiation of bacterial and fungal corneal ulcers from India

Author:

Rosenberg Christopher R1,Prajna Venkatesh2,Srinivasan Muthiah K2,Lalitha Prajna C2,Krishnan Tiru3,Rajaraman Revathi4,Venugopal Anitha5,Acharya Nisha6,Seitzman Gerami D6,Rose-Nussbaumer Jennifer7,Woodward Maria A8,Lietman Thomas M6,Campbell John Peter1,Keenan Jeremy D6,Redd Travis K1,

Affiliation:

1. Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

3. Department of Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Hospital, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, India

4. Department of Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

5. Department of Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India

6. Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

7. Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, CA, USA

8. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Michigan, USA

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to identify the sources of differential performance and misclassification error among local (Indian) and external (non-Indian) corneal specialists in identifying bacterial and fungal keratitis based on corneal photography. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of survey data assessing the ability of corneal specialists to identify acute bacterial versus fungal keratitis by using corneal photography. One-hundred images of 100 eyes from 100 patients with acute bacterial or fungal keratitis in South India were previously presented to an international cohort of cornea specialists for interpretation over the span of April to July 2021. Each expert provided a predicted probability that the ulcer was either bacterial or fungal. Using these data, we performed multivariable linear regression to identify factors predictive of expert performance, accounting for primary practice location and surrogate measures to infer local fungal ulcer prevalence, including locality, latitude, and dew point. In addition, Brier score decomposition was used to determine experts’ reliability (“calibration”) and resolution (“boldness”) and were compared between local (Indian) and external (non-Indian) experts. Results: Sixty-six experts from 16 countries participated. Indian practice location was the only independently significant predictor of performance in multivariable linear regression. Resolution among Indian experts was significantly better (0.08) than among non-Indian experts (0.01; P < 0.001), indicating greater confidence in their predictions. There was no significant difference in reliability between the two groups (P = 0.40). Conclusion: Local cornea experts outperformed their international counterparts independent of regional variability in tropical risk factors for fungal keratitis. This may be explained by regional characteristics of infectious ulcers with which local corneal specialists are familiar.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference25 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3