Profile of nonattending patients at psychiatric outpatient clinics before (in-person model) and during COVID-19 pandemic (telepsychiatry model): A comparison study

Author:

Kiani Mahum1,Kar Nilamadhab123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wolverhampton, UK

2. University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK

3. Faculty of Contemplative and Behavioural Sciences, Sri Sri University, Cuttack, Odisha, India

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Missed appointments in mental health services have been a concern; as nonattendance may be associated with various clinical risk factors. AIMS: We intended to compare the profile of nonattenders at psychiatric outpatient clinics before (in-person model) and during the COVID-19 pandemic when the services changed to remote consultations (telepsychiatry model). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical features (diagnosis, medical and psychological treatment, care program approach, and first contact), risk to self and others, and demographic variables (age, gender, ethnicity, accommodation, occupation, and benefits) were collected from the electronic records. The outcomes after the missed appointment were also noted. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 23 nonattenders in January 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and 32 nonattenders in November 2020 (during COVID-19); with an overall rate of nonattendance of 20% and 22%, respectively. Nonattenders during COVID-19 were significantly (P < 0.05) younger (36.4 ± 10.2 vs. 45.3 ± 15.0), and had more male patients (68.8% vs. 31.3%) compared to pre-COVID-19. There were no differences in other demographic variables, diagnoses, treatment received, or level of care. Risk to self was significantly more during COVID-19 (34.4% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.05) and risk to others was less (0.0% vs. 17.4%, P < 0.05). Significantly more (P < 0.05) nonattenders were contacted by letters during COVID-19 (81.3%) than pre-COVID-19 (52.2%); a higher (P < 0.05) proportion of nonattenders were discharged from services during COVID-19 (34.4%) compared to pre-COVID-19 period (8.7%). CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19, when psychiatric outpatient services changed to remote consultations, there were differences in the profile of nonattenders and their risks. The results suggest that telepsychiatry services should explore the profile of nonattenders and their risks for arranging appropriate support.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3