Comparative study of epilepsy registry system in America, England, Australia, and Iran

Author:

Chitsaz Ahmad1,Nopour Sahar2,Bagherian Hossein3,Ajami Sima3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjerib Avenue, Isfahan, Iran

2. School of Medical Management and Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjerib Avenue, Isfahan, Iran

3. Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Medical Management and Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjerib Avenue, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disease registries are one of the important steps in the development of health information systems. The aim of this study was to compare epilepsy registration systems in the United States, England, and Australia and propose a National Epilepsy Registry System for Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a descriptive–comparative study conducted between 2020 and 2023, which involved the following steps: identification and selected countries with advanced registry systems in the world and Identification of their characteristics and comparison with each other. The research population included the epilepsy registration registry in Australia, England, the United States, and Iran. In this study, data were collected from forms, observations, and documents. RESULTS: In Australia, all databases, reports, and minimum datasets are electronically sent to the Australian Epilepsy Register. In England, the Epilepsy Society is responsible for collecting information. In the United States, all individuals with epilepsy voluntarily send their information to registry centers and the Epilepsy Society to help with their treatment. However, there is no national epilepsy registry system in Iran. Therefore, recommendations have been made to establish. CONCLUSION: Registration systems can help collect and analyze data related to all patients with a particular disease. When this registration is established at the national level, it becomes a valuable clinical tool for improving the quality of care and can be a significant step toward managing care for epilepsy patients and healthcare centers. Indeed, such a system can also help in preventing the onset of epilepsy and planning for the improvement of the quality of life for patients.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference14 articles.

1. Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies;Fiest;Neurology,2017

2. Comparison of mental health, self-esteem and aggression in epilepsy and normal pupils;Zarezadegan;Bimonthly J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci (HMJ),2013

3. Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016;Beghi;Lancet Neurol,2019

4. Prevalence of epilepsy in Iran: A meta-analysis and systematic review;Sayehmiri;Iran J Child Neurol,2014

5. Clinical and demographic characteristics and quality of life in patients with epilepsy;Darabi;Payesh,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3