Correlation between clinicopathological indices and expression of cluster of differentiation 24 and cluster of differentiation 44 biomarkers in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: A follow-up study

Author:

Ghazi Narges1,Saghravanian Nasrollah1,Anvari Kazem2,Mirhashemi Majid1,Erfanian Mohammadhadi3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2. Cancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common oral cavity cancer and may occur following oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). Cancer stem cells (CSCs) can self-renew and multi-directionally differentiate to promote tumorigenesis with high expression of cluster of differentiation (CD) 24 and CD44 markers. CSCs play a pivotal role in tumor development, drug resistance, and relapse after treatment. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between both marker expressions and clinicopathological indices in OED and OSCC patients. Materials and Methods: In this follow-up study, we could access 37 patients, including 12 OEDs and 25 OSCCs (Grade I: n = 9, Grade II: n = 8, and Grade III: n = 8). Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26) and log-rank tests, Fisher’s exact test, Chi-square, and one-way ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no significant difference in the expression of CD24 and CD44 markers between the study groups (P > 0.05) and the expression of both markers and clinicopathological indices in the study groups (P > 0.05). The mean and standard deviation of overall survival (OS) were 54.46 ± 43.08 with a range of 6–193 months, and they were 8.24 ± 15.34 months with a range of 0–70 months for disease-free survival (DFS) in patients, respectively. The average of DFS in Grade I was significantly lower than the OED (P = 0.002) and Grade II (P = 0.039) groups. The OS average in the Grade I (P = 0.014) and Grade III (P = 0.004) groups was statistically lower than the OED group. Conclusion: Although more than half of the patients demonstrated high expression of both markers, there was no statistically significant difference between them and clinicopathological indices.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3