A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Various Disinfectants for Extracted Human Teeth - A Comparative Study

Author:

Srivastava Himanshu1,Qureshi Sameera Mohd Rehman2,Singh Chintu Kumar1,Mastud Santoshkumar Pandurang3,Handa Amit4,Shukla Manish Kumar5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Aditya Dental College and Hospital, Beed, Maharashtra, India

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aditya Dental College and Hospital, Beed, Maharashtra, India

3. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Aditya Dental College and Hospital, Beed, Maharashtra, India

4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India

5. Department of Dentistry, MSD Autonomous State Medical College, Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of various disinfectants for extracting human teeth. The objectives were to assess the effectiveness of 5% vinegar, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 70% alcohol, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite for disinfection of extracted human teeth. Methods: The teeth were divided into one of the following four groups consisting of 10 teeth in each group. All teeth were immersed in separate bottles containing 10 ml of the disinfectant for 7 days at 25°C. No visible growth in the broth was considered effective disinfection. The Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) Number is SVIEC/ON/DENT/SRP/15186, and the IEC Clearance number is SVIEC/ON/DENT/SRP/15040. Results: Vinegar was most effective for bacterial disinfection, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite was most effective for fungal disinfection. The result was statistically significant with Chi-square values of 0.015 and 0.057, respectively, and P < 0.001. Conclusions: Extracted teeth should be handled with extreme care as these are a potential source of infection. The present study documented the role of various disinfectants. Vinegar can be used as an effective disinfectant medium for extracting human teeth. Sterilisation and autoclaving are superior options while vinegar is cheap, readily available, and relatively non-toxic. All these qualities plus the fact that it has given encouraging results as an antibacterial disinfectant should necessitate its usage on a more regular basis than it is used at present.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference10 articles.

1. Vinegar as a disinfectant of extracted teeth;Tijare;J Oral Maxillofac Pathol,2014

2. Disinfection methods of extracted human teeth;Lolayekar;J Oral Health Comm Dent,2007

3. Sterilisation of extracted human teeth for educational use;Kumar;Indian J Med Microbiol,2005

4. Sterilization and disinfection of extracted human teeth for institutional use;Ghosh;Int J Clin Dent Sci,2013

5. Sterilization of extracted human teeth;Pantera;J Dent Educ,1990

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3