Customised Enriched Coconut Oil as Panacea for Oral Biofilm Mediated Diseases - A Prospective Study

Author:

Sai Shamini1,Nivedha Raga T1,Narasimhan Srinivasan2,Veronica Aruna K.1,Selvakumar Jayaraman3,Susila Anand V.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Madha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

2. Department of Endodontics, Hamad Dental Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

3. Department of Periodontics, Adhiparashakthi Dental College and Hospital, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate a customised enriched formulation of coconut (CEC) oil with Arimedadi Tailam (AT) and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth rinse (CHX) for their plaque control and potential anticaries effects using the oratest in healthy volunteers. Settings and Design: Parallel, double-blinded (outcome assessor and statistician), randomised controlled institution-based pilot study. Methods and Materials: 60 adults (18-22 years) having DMFT score of 2-11, gingival and plaque index as zero, no history of antibiotics for one month or fluoride application in 2 weeks were randomly divided (computer-generated list) and allocated into 3 groups (A-CHX, B-CEC, C-AT) of 20 subjects each based on the intervention. Oratest at baseline, days 15 and 30 were recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: Due to 5 dropouts on day 30, data were analysed based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. The difference in oratest scores (baseline vs. day 15 and 30) were found to be normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene's test). One way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used to determine the statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between groups. Results: Plaque and gingival index was zero throughout the study period. Difference in oratest scores was highest with CEC oil, followed by CHX and AT though there was no statistically significant differences between groups at baseline vs day 15 (P = 0.203) and baseline vs day 30 (P = 0.085) and between oils from baseline vs day 30 (P = 0.068). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the pilot study, both oils are comparable to CHX for their antiplaque and anticaries potential. Clinically, CEC was better than AT though statistical difference was not there.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Dentistry,General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. In sickness and in health—What does the oral microbiome mean to us? An ecological perspective;Marsh;Adv Dent Res,2018

2. CariesCare practice guide: Consensus on evidence into practice;Martignon;Br Dent J,2019

3. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health;James;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

4. Effects of chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral microbiome;Bescos;Sci Rep,2020

5. Current uses of chlorhexidine for management of oral disease: A narrative review;Brookes;J Dent,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3