A Comparative Study on Conventional Adenoidectomy and Endoscopic Powered Adenoidectomy

Author:

Devi Sanu1,Bhatnagar Aastha1,Swami Gautam1,Kamal Anil Kumar1,Parihar Anil Kumar2,Nidhi 1

Affiliation:

1. Department of ENT, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

2. Department of Paediatrics, Venkateshwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Introduction: Adenoids are a type of nasopharyngeal lymphoid tissue that is a component of Waldeyer’s ring. They are typically present from birth, reach their maximum size between the ages of 7 and 10 years, and then gradually decrease in size to become atrophied in adulthood. The objective of the current study is to compare conventional adenoidectomy using curette with power-assisted adenoidectomy. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Center from March 2023 to August 2023. A total of 40 patients were planned for adenoidectomy and randomly allocated under two groups. The conventional curettage adenoidectomy method was done on patients in Group A and patients in Group B who underwent power-assisted adenoidectomy using microdebrider. Both the groups were further compared in terms of surgical clearance of adenoids, operative time taken in procedure, injury to surrounding structures, and symptom score improvement on follow-up. Results: Surgical clearance was excellent in Group B with no adenoid tags left in all 20 (100%) patients, whereas few tags were left in 18 (90%) patients in Group A (P < 0.0001). The mean operative time (in minutes) for Group A was 22.4 ± 1.67, whereas Group B was 18.1 ± 1.76 (P = 0.001). Postoperative pain score in Group A was 3.7 ± 1.63, whereas for Group B was 2.8 ± 1.01 (P < 0.043). Recovery time in terms of number of days to return to normal diet and activities in Group A was 3.1 ± 0.3 days, whereas Group B was less 2.1 ± 0.2 days (P < 001). Postoperative nasal symptom score at 6 weeks in Group A was 1 in 1 patient and 2 in 4 patients with mean of 0.45 ± 83, whereas in Group B was 0 (P = 0.043). Conclusion: It was concluded from the study that power-assisted adenoidectomy was a better surgical procedure than conventional adenoidectomy. There was better improvement in nasal symptom score and surgical clearance by power-assisted adenoidectomy. Postoperative pain score and time taken for recovery after surgery were also less in power-assisted adenoidectomy.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference18 articles.

1. Endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider;Somani;Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2010

2. Role of adenoidectomy in otitis media and respiratory function;Mattila;Curr Allergy Asthma Rep,2010

3. Comparison of transoral/transnasal endoscopic-guided adenoidectomy with endoscopic nasopharyngeal inspection at the end of curettage adenoidectomy;Yaman;Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2015

4. Endoscopic-assisted adenoidectomy;Cannon;Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,1999

5. Endoscopic adenoidectomy; use or abuse of the technology?;Bross Soriano;Cir Cir,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3