Prospective comparative analysis of intraoperative and postoperative anesthetic and analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided pectoral with serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic paravertebral versus erector spinae blocks in breast oncosurgeries

Author:

Kangle Sameer1,Dudhedia Ujjwalraj1,Pradhan Amol Shashikumar1,Nair Abhijit Sukumaran2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. L. H. Hiranandani, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Ibra Hospital, Ministry of Health-Oman, Ibra, Oman

Abstract

Abstract Aims and Objectives: Different regional anesthetic techniques have been described and are frequently used in breast cancer surgeries to provide efficient pain management and reduce the use of opioids. This study’s main goal was to use pain scores to compare the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of pectoral nerve (PECS 1) block with serratus anterior plane (SAP) block, thoracic paravertebral (TPV) block, and erector spinae plane (ESP) block. Comparing the needs for intraoperative analgesia and postoperative anesthesia was one of the secondary goals. Methods: After institutional ethical committee approval and after prospectively registering this trial with the Clinical Trials Registry of India, 25 patients were randomized and enrolled in each group (Group 1 – PECS 1 and SAP block, Group 2 – TPV group, and Group 3 – ESP group). Standard general anesthesia was administered to all the patients and the blocks, as per randomization were performed before anesthesia induction. Results: The demographic characteristics, intraoperative opioid and sevoflurane consumption, and requirement of rescue analgesia were comparable between the three groups. Pain scores at 0 and 6 h were significantly less in the TPV group when compared to the ESP group and PECS 1 with the SAP group (P = 0.005 and P = 0.006, respectively). Pain scores at 12 and 24 h were comparable between three groups. Conclusion: TPV block provides significantly better pain scores at 0 and 6 h, with comparable pain scores at 12 and 24 h, compared to PECS 1 with SAP block and ESP block with comparable adverse events.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3