Synovial Fluid Alpha-defensin Lateral Flow Assay is Specific but Not Sensitive for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Revision Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

Author:

Yu Sze Hon1,Yuen Chiu Kwong2,Wong Constance1,Amy Cheung2,Hong Cheung Man2,Kwan Chan Vincent Wai3,Hilda Luk Michelle3,Keung Chan Ping2,Fu Henry3

Affiliation:

1. Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China

3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Abstract

Abstract Background: Synovial fluid alpha-defensin lateral flow assay (ADLFA) is a quick adjunctive test in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary arthroplasty. However, evidence is lacking for postrevision arthroplasty cases. Thus, we investigated the performance of ADLFA in revision cases and compared it to a control cohort of primary arthroplasty cases. Methods: One hundred eleven suspected PJI cases with previous total knee or hip arthroplasty between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively included; they were minimally followed up for 12 months after joint aspiration. Cases were stratified into the revision and control (primary) group using propensity score matching in a 1:2 ratio. The 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria were the gold standard for PJI and the Delphi-based consensus criteria for persistent infection. Results: After matching, the two groups exhibited comparable baselines. The sensitivity and specificity for revision cases were 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] =23.0%–77.0%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 83.2%–100.0%), respectively, and for primary cases, it was 75.0% (95% CI = 55.1%–89.3%) and 100.0% (95% CI = 90.3%–100.0%), respectively. Thus, ADLFA was less sensitive for revision arthroplasty but equally specific for both primary and revision cases. Furthermore, the sensitivity for ADLFA varied considerably between revision surgeries for septic causes and aseptic causes, but specificity remained 100.0%. Conclusion: ADLFA was highly specific but not sensitive in diagnosing PJI in postrevision arthroplasty cases. It is suited as a convenient confirmatory adjunct alongside the existing criteria.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3