Author:
Abdelrahim Ala Mohamed,Abuaffan Amal Hussein
Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate and compare the reliability, reproducibility, and speed of two cephalometric tracing methods computer-aided cephalometric tracing and manual tracing.
Materials and Methods:
This was an analytical, cross-sectional study. One hundred and three pretreatment cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected from the orthodontics department of a public university. Twelve cephalometric landmarks were identified, and fifteen measurements were calculated both manually and digitally using Vistadent OC software. The reliability of measurements was assessed for each method by applying the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Paired t-test was used to compare the measurements' reproducibility and time difference between the two methods.
Results:
All angular and linear measurements for both the methods showed a range of moderate correlation (0.8 ≥ ICC ≥0.5) to strong correlation (ICC ≥0.8) except for L1-MAD, which displayed a poor correlation for both manual and digital tracing, (ICC = 0.36 and 0.33, respectively), as well as digital tracing of interincisal angle (ICC = 0.36). No statistically significant differences between the two methods were observed for all angular and linear measurements except upper anterior facial height (UAFH) and lower anterior facial height (P = 0.000). There was a statistically significant time difference between the two techniques (P = 0.000). The mean tracing time of the operator for single tracing was 18.02 min for manual tracing and 8.85 min when using the Vistadent program.
Conclusion:
Cephalometric measurements in conventional manual and digital cephalometric analysis are highly reliable. Although the reproducibility of some measurements between two methods showed statistically significant differences, most differences were considered minimal and clinically acceptable. Computer-assisted cephalometric analysis proved to be more time-efficient.
Reference19 articles.
1. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: A comparison of conventional and digital methods;Albarakati;Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2012
2. Enhanced speed and precision of measurement in a computer-assisted digital cephalometric analysis system;Chen;Angle Orthod,2004
3. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiography, Part 1: Advantages and limitations of digital imaging;Forsyth;Angle Orthod,1996
4. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric measurements of monitor-displayed images by Nemoceph software and its hard copy by manual tracing;Tikku;J Oral Biol Craniofac Res,2014
5. Differences in cephalometric measurements: A comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods;Polat-Ozsoy;Eur J Orthod,2009