Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes in Neonates with Left-sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia with Only Skin Closure versus Abdominal Muscle Closure

Author:

Vutukuru Sravanthi1,Menon Prema1,Solanki Shailesh1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Advanced Pediatric Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: This study aims to compare the outcome of neonatal left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH, Bochdalek type) repair through laparotomy with and without abdominal muscle closure. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between January 2012 and May 2021 at a neonatal surgical unit of a Tertiary Care Center. Demographic details, preoperative management, Two-dimensional-echo, intra-operative findings, postoperative course, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results: The study group comprised 50 neonates with a mean standard deviation (SD) age at admission: 4.44 (5.12) days, male: female ratio of 3:2, and mean (SD) weight: 2.73 (0.51) kg. Following repair of the diaphragmatic defect through laparotomy, 26 (52%) underwent skin closure alone, whereas 24 (48%) underwent abdominal muscle closure. Postoperatively, there was a significant fall in the level of platelets (P = 0.021), increase in pressure support by at least 4–5 cm H2O (P = 0.027), and increase in the blood urea (P < 0.001), creatinine (P = 0.005), lactate (P = 0.019), and acidosis (P = 0.048) in the muscle closure group. Although not statistically significant, there was a fall in the urine output and blood pressure in this group. There was no significant difference in the duration of inotropes. Mortality was 8 (32%) in the skin closure group, and 14 (61%) in the muscle closure group (P = 0.05). Conclusions: Neonates undergoing left CDH repair through the abdominal route with skin closure alone, had better survival, as well as hematological, renal, and ventilatory parameters than those who underwent muscle closure. It is a useful surgical modification to improve outcome in centers with limited facilities.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3