An International Consensus Survey among Pediatric Surgeons on the Role of Appendectomy in Malrotation

Author:

Menon Revathy1,Rathod Kirtikumar J.1,Sinha Arvind1,Minocha Ashish2,Hernandez Carlos Garcia3,Jiang Dapeng4,Raboei Enaam5,Cai Jiaoyang4,Gallo Lily J Saldana6,Chitnis Milind7,Gera Purushottam8,Pandya Samir9,Al Balushi Zainab10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK

3. Department of Pediatric Surgery, National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City, Mexico

4. Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Shanghai, China

5. Medical Reference Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

6. Department of Pediatric Surgery, National Institute of Children’s health of San Borja, Lima, Peru

7. Department of Pediatric Surgery, East London Hospital Complex and Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa

8. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Perth, Perth, Australia

9. UT Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA

10. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Ladd’s procedure, originally described in 1936 for the treatment of malrotation, does not traditionally include appendectomy as a standard step. We conducted a multinational survey to investigate the current consensus on the role of appendectomy in Ladd’s procedure. Methodology: An anonymous online survey was distributed to pediatric surgeons worldwide. The survey collected demographic data and explored surgical preferences related to the management of malrotation. Open-ended questions were used to assess the opinions regarding the necessity of appendectomy, decision-making factors, and complications associated with appendectomy during Ladd’s procedure. Results: A total of 343 responses were received from 46 countries. Of the respondents, 319 (93%) were consultants and 24 (7%) were residents/trainees. When asked about the choice between open and laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure, 292 (85%) preferred open surgery. Overall, 184 (53%) respondents favored appendectomy in both open and laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure. Furthermore, 172 (50%) surgeons advocated for appendectomy in all malrotation cases, citing concerns about potential future appendicitis. While differences existed between all comparisons, none of them reached statistical significance. The factors influencing the decision to preserve the appendix included the risk of postoperative complications and the potential future use of the appendix as a surgical conduit. The surgical complications following appendectomy included surgical site infections in 14 (33%) patients, adhesive obstruction in 13 (31%) patients, intrabdominal abscesses in 10 (24%) patients, and fecal fistulas in 5 (12%) patients. Conclusion: The majority of surgeons aim to perform appendectomy in all malrotation cases, considering the potential risks and benefits of this approach. These findings offer valuable insights for clinical practice and may inform future guidelines and decision-making algorithms.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3