ACBC Study Protocol – Acute Colon Resection Versus Bridge to Colon Surgery with Stent Placement or Stoma Diversion: A Prospective Cohort Study

Author:

Axmarker Tobias1,Jörgren Fredrik2,Landerholm Kalle3,Asklid Daniel4,Damkilde Niklas5,Schedvins Per6,Folkesson Joakim7,Sverrison Ingvar8,Vinnars Petrus9,Sjöström Olle10,Bakhti Arash Morad11,Prytz Mattias12,Larsson Per-Anders13,Inci Kamuran14,Holmberg Carl-Jacob Khailat15,Syk Ingvar1,Jutesten Henrik1,Park Jennifer16,Buchwald Pamela1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

2. Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden

3. Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden

4. Department of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

5. Department of Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden

6. Department of Surgery, Kristianstad Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden

7. Department of Surgery, Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

8. Department of Surgery, Västerås Hospital, Västerås, Sweden

9. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

10. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Östersund Surgical Teaching and Scientific Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

11. Department of Surgery, Ystad Hospital, Ystad, Sweden

12. Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Department of Research and Development, NU Hospital Group, Department of Surgery, NU Hospital Group, Skövde, Sweden

13. Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Region Västra Götaland, Department of Surgery, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden

14. Department of Surgery, Halland Hospital Varberg, Region Halland, Sweden

15. Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden

16. Department of Surgery, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background: Approximately 70% of all colon cancer emergencies result from colonic obstruction. Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry indicate that patients undergoing emergency surgical resections for colon cancer face higher overall 30-day morbidity and increased mortality rates—5.8% at 30 days and 11.2% at 90 days—compared to those undergoing elective procedures, which have mortality rates of 1.1% and 2.0%, respectively. Other concerns about acute colon cancer resections are oncological outcomes. Long-term outcomes are significantly worse, with higher rates of recurrence and cancer-related death, regardless of the cancer stage or the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Objectives: To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of primary resection for malignant colonic obstruction compared to only decompression using a self-expandable endoscopic metallic stent or diverting stomas as the first intervention (bridge to surgery) followed by later oncological resection. Design: This is a prospective observational study with data collected through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry with an additional electronic case report form. Settings: Swedish multicenter study at both university and regional hospitals. Patients and Methods: Patients with suspected acute malignant large bowel obstruction due to colonic adenocarcinoma will be identified and followed. Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Descriptive statistics of the study cohort will be presented. Primary endpoints will be subjected to multivariate analyses adjusted for confounders. Main Outcome Measures: 30-day severe morbidity (Clavien–Dindo > 3a), 30- and 90-day mortality rates, and overall survival after three and five years. Sample Size: We aim to include 1000 patients, with an interim analysis after the recruitment of 500 patients. Results: The study is ongoing. Conclusions: Acute colon obstruction is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We hypothesize that patients with malignant obstruction benefit from avoidance of emergency cancer resection and that bridge to surgery leads to decreased short-term morbidity and mortality and improved long-term oncological outcomes. Limitations: The main limitation is the risk of selection bias when the study is not a randomized controlled trial, which would be a standard process. A prospective observational study is, nevertheless, considered a pragmatic compromise between feasibility and ability to answer the research question. Conflicts of Interest: None.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3