Psychometric Properties of Instruments Assessing Intrinsic Capacity: A Systematic Review

Author:

Chen Yi-Jung1,Kukreti Shikha2,Yang Hsin-Lun1,Liu Chien-Chih3,Yeh Ya-Chin4,Fung Xavier C. C.5,Liu Chieh-Hsiu67,Liu Li-Fan8ORCID,Griffiths Mark D.9,Yang Yi-Ching1011,Lin Chung-Ying11213ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan

2. Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan

3. Center for General Education, National Tainan Junior College of Nursing, Tainan

4. Department of Occupational Therapy, Shu-Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

5. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

6. Department of Family Medicine, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan

7. School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan

8. Institute of Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan

9. Department of Psychology, International Gaming Research Unit, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

10. Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan

11. Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan

12. Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan

13. Biostatistics Consulting Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan

Abstract

Introduction: Intrinsic capacity (IC) is a multidimensional indicator proposed by the World Health Organization that encompasses mental and physical capacities associated with functional ability. With the help of IC, different pathways of aging can be better understood, and heterogeneity can be captured more effectively. Before IC can be clinically incorporated, it requires valid and usable instruments alongside a comprehensive evaluation of psychometric evidence. Therefore, the present systematic review critically appraised, compared, and summarized the measurement properties of existing IC instruments used by older people. Methods: Published studies were searched in seven databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science, until August 2022. The measurement properties of the IC measures were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Results: Of the 582 papers initially identified, 10 studies were eligible for inclusion. Seven instruments were classified as five-domain measures, and three as more than five-domain measures. No instrument assessed all nine criteria in the psychometric properties evaluation outlined by COSMIN. The most reported psychometric properties were construct validity (n = 8), measurement invariance (n = 8), and structural validity (n = 7). There was underreporting of content validity, reliability, and measurement error. Conclusion: The present review indicated a general lack of psychometric assessments of existing IC instruments with independent studies as their evidence base. There is a need to explore further the associations of IC and its five domains of interaction, which express the ability of individuals to interact with the environment and affect their functional ability.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3