A Review of Landmark Judgments on Medical Negligence

Author:

Munisankar Prudvi1,Mada Prashanth1,Banka Lahari1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Bibinagar, Telangana, India

Abstract

Abstract In light of the survey by the Indian Medical Association showing prevalent fear among medical practitioners regarding legal repercussions, this article examines key judicial precedents that uphold the rights and responsibilities of doctors in cases of alleged medical negligence. Drawing from notable cases such as Martin F. D’ Souza versus Mohd. Ishfaq and Kusum Sharma and Ors versus Batra Hospital and Med. Research Center, the authors interpret crucial principles and emphasize the significance of adherence to standard practices. In addition, it throws light on recent legislative amendments, notably Section 106(1) of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and proposed reforms to alleviate criminal prosecution for medical negligence cases. Overall, the analysis presented herein seeks to strengthen the confidence of medical practitioners, reduce their apprehensions regarding legal complications, and promote an encouraging environment for the practice of medicine.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3