Comparison of Longitudinal and Transverse Transperitoneal Incisions in Abdominal Aortic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis

Author:

Gupta Aditya1,Pandey Ashutosh Kumar1,Manchikanti Sriram1,Sun Neelamjingbha1,Pitchai Shivanesan1

Affiliation:

1. Department of CVTS, Division of Vascular Surgery, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) may be treated with endovascular intervention or open surgical repair. Despite the possibility of a retroperitoneal approach for open surgery, many surgeons prefer a transperitoneal approach. Transperitoneal aortic exposure may be done by longitudinal or transverse incisions. Transverse incisions are thought to be less painful and have less perioperative complications as compared to longitudinal midline incisions, but the reports to this effect are not conclusive. To address the lack of data comparing perioperative outcomes in aortic surgery incisions, our center conducted a retrospective study. Our aim was to generate concrete evidence regarding the choice of incision and its impact on surgical outcomes, filling a crucial gap in existing knowledge. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive cases were selected from our institute’s database who underwent elective open AAA repair, with 26 cases each in longitudinal and transverse incision group. Data were analyzed to compare the effects of type of incision for abdominal aortic surgery on the duration of ventilatory requirements and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative ileus, perioperative analgesia requirement, and the duration of hospital stay in these patient groups. Results: Baseline characteristics and comorbidities of the study population were comparable. Postoperative hospital stays were notably shorter for patients with transverse incisions than those with longitudinal incisions. The transverse incision group also exhibited a statistically significant reduction in postoperative ileus development. However, no significant differences were observed between the two study groups in terms of ventilatory requirements, postoperative analgesia needs, and ICU stays. Conclusion: The ongoing discourse in the literature surrounding the incision choices find support in our study, indicative of advantages of transverse incisions that include lower postoperative ileus and shorter hospital stays. However, no clear benefits were observed regarding postoperative ventilation and analgesic requirements. Study limitations underscore the necessity for future prospective research with larger samples and longer follow-ups, yet the findings suggest that transverse incisions may offer improved perioperative outcomes, potentially easing financial strains on patients and health-care systems through reduced hospitalization durations.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3