Epidural Catheterization in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Risk Assessment of Epidural Hematoma

Author:

Laferrière-Langlois Pascal1,Jeffries Sean23,Harutyunyan Robert23,Hemmerling Thomas M.23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, CIUSSS de l’Est de L’Ile de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

2. Department of Experimental Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada

3. Intelligent Technology Anaesthesia Group (ITAG) Laboratory, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT The potential benefits of epidural anesthesia on mortality, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary complications must be weighed against the risk of epidural hematoma associated with intraoperative heparinization. This study aims to provide an updated assessment of the clinical risks of epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgery, focusing on the occurrence of epidural hematomas and subsequent paralysis. A systematic search of Embase, Medline, Ovid Central, Web of Science, and PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications between 1966 and 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of the retrieved manuscripts. Studies reporting adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with epidural catheterization were included. The incidence of hematomas was calculated by dividing the number of hematomas by the total number of patients in the included studies. Risk calculations utilized various denominators based on the rigor of trial designs, and the risks of hematoma and paralysis were compared to other commonly encountered risks. The analysis included a total of 33,089 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with epidural catheterization. No epidural hematomas were reported across all published RCTs, prospective, and retrospective trials. Four case reports associated epidural hematoma with epidural catheterization and perioperative heparinization. The risks of epidural hematoma and subsequent paralysis were estimated at 1:7643 (95% CI 1:3860 to 380,916) and 1:10,190 (95% CI 1:4781 to 0:1), respectively. The risk of hematoma is similar to the non-obstetric population (1:5405; 95% CI 1:4784 to 6134). The risk of hematoma in cardiac surgery patients receiving epidural anesthesia is therefore similar to that observed in some other surgical non-obstetric populations commonly exposed to epidural catheterization.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference51 articles.

1. Benefits and risks of epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery;Landoni;Br J Anaesth,2015

2. Epidurals for cardiac surgery:Can we substantially reduce surgical morbidity or should we focus on quality of recovery?;Royse;Anesthesiology,2011

3. High thoracic epidural analgesia for cardiac surgery:time to move from morbidity to quality of recovery indicators;Royse;Ann Card Anaesth,2009

4. 2017 EACTS Guidelines on perioperative medication in adult cardiac surgery;Sousa-Uva;Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2018

5. Epidural analgesia for adults undergoing cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass;Guay;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3