Robotic-assisted microsurgery in andrology: a systematic review

Author:

Douroumis Konstantinos12,Spartalis Eleftherios13,Stravodimos Konstantinos12,Levis Panagiotis K2,Tsourouflis Gerasimos13,Dimitroulis Dimitrios13,Nikiteas Nikolaos I13

Affiliation:

1. Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 15b, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece

2. First Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 17, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece

3. Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Agiou Thoma 17, Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece.

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery is the gold standard of treatment in many fields of urology. In this systematic review, we aim to report its usage in andrology and to evaluate any advantages. A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify articles referring to robotic-assisted microsurgery in andrology. The search strategy was in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. The articles were then reviewed by two authors. A qualitative analysis of the articles that met the inclusion criteria was performed. Thirty-one articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The first results for robot-assisted vasovasostomy (RAVV) are encouraging as excellent patency rates, short operative times, and learning curves were achieved. Interestingly, patency rates were greater in some case series for RAVV than for microsurgical vasovasostomy, with a statistically significant difference. In addition, robot has been shown to be of great use in bypassing fibrotic changes in cases of iatrogenic vasal injuries, difficulties encountered with traditional microsurgery. In addition, the feasibility of robot-assisted microsurgery has been proven for varicocelectomy and microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord, with acceptable improvement in sperm parameters and pain, respectively. The current evidence suggests that there are potential advantages of the use of robots in andrology. However, for robotic surgery to become incorporated into the daily use of the andrologists, large, multicenter randomized trials are needed. As robotics systems are becoming standard in urology practice, it is reasonable for one to believe that they will also find their place in andrology.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Urology,General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1 850 000) of three French regions (|y1988-1989);Thonneau;Hum Reprod,1991

2. Microsurgical management of male infertility;Goldstein;Nat Clin Pract Urol,2006

3. Nonobstructive azoospermia:a revolutionary surgical approach and results;Schlegel;Semin Reprod Med,2009

4. [Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot Report of a case];Abbou;Prog Urol,2000

5. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion;Menon;BJU Int,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3