Glycated hemoglobin as a predictive factor for postoperative outcome in controlled versus uncontrolled diabetic patients with ankle fractures

Author:

Zakaria Ahmed R.,Hussein Abdalla R.,Abouzied Mahmoud

Abstract

Background Ankle fracture in diabetic patients is a challenging condition owing to the inherent risk of complications with either operative or nonoperative treatment. However, operative treatment is considered the gold standard treatment for such cases. In this study, the hypothesis is that the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) could have a predictive value for postoperative outcomes and complications. Patients and methods A total of 34 diabetic patients with ankle fractures were included in this study. The patients are divided into two groups: the first group included patients with controlled diabetes (HbA1c<7) and the second group included patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c≥7). All patients were treated by standard open reduction and internal fixation. Results The complications rate was higher in the uncontrolled diabetes group (63.2%) than in the controlled diabetes group (26.6%). Preoperative HbA1c was higher in complicated patients than in uncomplicated patients (P=0.033), and postoperative HbA1c was also higher in complicated patients than in uncomplicated patients (P=0.031). The postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was significantly higher in the controlled diabetes group than in the uncontrolled diabetes group (P=0.046). Conclusion The overall rate of complications was higher in the uncontrolled diabetes group (HbA1c≥7) than in the controlled diabetes group (HbA1c<7), with a statistically significant difference. These complications were mainly related to wound healing. Despite being statistically insignificant, poor radiological outcome was more common in the uncontrolled diabetes group. According to the postoperative AOFAS score, clinical outcome was more superior in the controlled diabetes group than in the uncontrolled diabetes group.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3