Comparison of Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Techniques in Periodontal Flap Surgery in the Mandible

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy of infiltration versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection techniques during periodontal flap surgery in the mandible is crucial for optimising patient care. This comparative study aims to evaluate the pain management, ease of administration and clinical outcomes associated with both anaesthetic methods. Infiltration anaesthesia involves localised administration, targeting specific sites, whereas IANB provides a broader anaesthetic effect by numbing the entire mandibular nerve. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each technique will enhance procedural efficiency and patient comfort. This research contributes valuable insights into best practices for periodontal surgeries. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five subjects who required periodontal flap surgery were included in the study to treat chronic periodontitis in the mandibular jaw. The surgery was performed under local infiltration of an anaesthetic agent on one side of the jaw and by an IANB on the other side. Pain perception was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at various intervals during periodontal flap surgery. The effect of anaesthesia between the two techniques was compared and evaluated by analysis of variance using IBM Corp. IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics for Windows [Version 25]. Armonk, New York, USA. IBM Corp; 2017. Results: Analysis determined the onset, duration and termination of anaesthesia induced by infiltration and the IANB technique. The onset and duration of anaesthesia by both techniques were comparable. The pain perception evaluated using the VAS score while using both anaesthesia techniques was also comparable. Conclusion: Infiltration anaesthesia can be used as an alternative to overcome the disadvantages and complications of IANB for periodontal surgery in the mandibular jaw.